mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Novel Method to Evaluate Models on Unreliable, Noisy and Inconsistent Labels: Adaptive Resolution Label Aggregation (ARLA)

arXiv 2607.11214 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Labels are critical for both training and evaluating deep learning segmentation models, but are often inconsistent, noisy, or ambiguous at class boundaries. Many approaches have been developed to support training models on weak labels, but few to none currently exist to facilitate evaluating models on unreliable labels. We therefore introduce a method called "Adaptive Resolution Label Aggregation", or "ARLA", which dynamically adapts the resolution of both the label and the model prediction at inference time before the evaluation metrics are computed. We demonstrate how ARLA can be used to better analyse model behaviour with a practical application to a real flood prediction model, where ARLA was able to overcome issues with inconsistent labelling of forested areas and errors in labels within regions of heavy cloud cover. Our work presents a new approach to evaluating segmentation models, with adjustable parameters to adapt the aggregated resolution to the precision of the label or the level of label noise. Fundamentally, ARLA exploits the information encapsulated by a label but minimises the label error, extracting from the noise a clearer signal of a model's true performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.

Builds on

15 of 28 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  2. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  3. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  4. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
  5. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  6. 2021Boundary IoU: Improving Object-Centric Image Segmentation Evaluationcited by 188
  7. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  8. 2017Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noisecited by 165
  9. 2021Active label cleaning for improved dataset quality under resource constraintscited by 44
  10. 2021Weighted Intersection over Union (wIoU) for Evaluating Image Segmentationcited by 11
  11. 2023Evaluating AI systems under uncertain ground truth: a case study in dermatologycited by 7
  12. 2022On Image Segmentation With Noisy Labels: Characterization and Volume Properties of the Optimal Solutions to Accuracy and Dicecited by 6
3 more
  1. 2024Noisy Annotations in Semantic Segmentationcited by 5
  2. 2022USE-Evaluator: Performance Metrics for Medical Image Segmentation Models with Uncertain, Small or Empty Reference Annotationscited by 3
  3. 2023Evaluating Classification Systems Against Soft Labels with Fuzzy Precision and Recallcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.