Policy-Driven CT-Agent: Modeling Phase-Aware Diagnostic Control for Clinically Consistent CT Reasoning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computed Tomography (CT) diagnosis often relies on dynamic selection of imaging phases, such as non-contrast, arterial, or venous phases, based on preliminary findings, clinical suspicion, and diagnostic guidelines. This phase-wise decision process is critical for reducing unnecessary radiation exposure while supporting timely staging and treatment planning. However, phase-selection protocols can vary across hospitals, regions, and guidelines, while most existing CT-based AI methods assume that all phases are available and focus on static tasks under a fixed imaging phase, failing to model whether additional phases are required. This limitation stems from heterogeneous multi-phase representations, the need for knowledge-guided phase control beyond visual cues, and the lack of supervision for phase-sufficiency decisions in existing datasets. To address these challenges, we propose Policy-Driven CT-Agent (PD-CTAgent) for clinically consistent CT phase selection and diagnostic reasoning. PD-CTAgent introduces a Clinical Structure Abstraction Module (CSAM) to harmonize heterogeneous CT phases into a unified, phase-aware evidence representation. Based on this representation, a Knowledge-Guided Diagnostic Control Model (KDCM) evaluates phase sufficiency and iteratively requests additional phases when necessary. The policy-driven agent design further allows PD-CTAgent to flexibly follow different institutional, regional, or guideline-specific diagnostic protocols. Together, PD-CTAgent bridges static CT analysis and real-world clinical workflows. Experiments on two public datasets, LIDC and MCT-LTDiag, and one private dataset demonstrate its effectiveness and clinical consistency. Code will be made public upon acceptance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2026.
Builds on
12 of 28 references.
References · 12
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
- 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiencycited by 1,419
- 2025Lingshu: A Generalist Foundation Model for Unified Multimodal Medical Understanding and Reasoningcited by 217
- 2024Agent Hospital: A Simulacrum of Hospital with Evolvable Medical Agentscited by 210
- 2025MedVLM-R1: Incentivizing Medical Reasoning Capability of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) via Reinforcement Learningcited by 172
- 2025MedAgent-Pro: Towards Evidence-based Multi-modal Medical Diagnosis via Reasoning Agentic Workflowcited by 71
- 2025PathFinder: A Multi-Modal Multi-Agent System for Medical Diagnostic Decision-Making Applied to Histopathologycited by 36
- 2024MedAdapter: Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Large Language Models towards Medical Reasoningcited by 35
- 2023CPLLM: Clinical Prediction with Large Language Modelscited by 34
- 2025CT-Agent: A Multimodal-LLM Agent for 3D CT Radiology Question Answeringcited by 20
- 2025MedChat: A Multi-Agent Framework for Multimodal Diagnosis with Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2025Abn-BLIP: Abnormality-aligned Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis and Report Generation from CTPAcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.