mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SVD-RAG: Efficient Tree-Organized Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Singular Value Decomposition

arXiv 2607.10316 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2026cs.IRcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems enhance large language models by retrieving relevant documents from external knowledge bases. Recent work by Sarthi et al. (2024) introduced RAPTOR, which organizes documents into hierarchical tree structures for efficient retrieval, but requires expensive LLM-based abstractive summarization at each internal node -- making large-scale deployment prohibitively costly. We present SVD-RAG, the first method to apply Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) on dense sentence embedding matrices for extractive summarization in hierarchical RAG. Unlike classical LSA which operates on sparse TF-IDF matrices, SVD-RAG exploits the rich semantic representations of modern embedding models, identifying the most informative sentences through their energy contribution in the principal components. Our approach is (1) deterministic -- unlike LLM-based summarization, SVD produces identical results for the same input; (2) cost-efficient -- tree construction requires no additional API calls beyond the initial embedding, reducing token consumption by ~85%; and (3) content-adaptive -- the energy-ratio threshold tau automatically adjusts compression based on content complexity. In a controlled head-to-head comparison using identical corpora, clustering, and beam search, SVD-RAG achieves retrieval quality within 1-5% of RAPTOR with LLM summarization (MRR 0.867 vs. 0.875, Recall@1 0.483 vs. 0.458) while building the tree 317x faster (0.1s vs. 31.7s). On a scaled multi-topic benchmark with 205 chunks and 100 queries across 20 topic variations, SVD-RAG achieves a 4.2x improvement in Recall@1 and 3.1x improvement in MRR over flat embedding retrieval. We provide a detailed cost analysis and parameter sensitivity study. Our implementation is released as an open-source Python package.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 5 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2026.

Builds on

5 of 9 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
  4. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,102
  5. 2024RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrievalcited by 532

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ELITE: Embedding-Less retrieval with Iterative Text Exploration
  2. 2025A Survey on Knowledge-Oriented Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  3. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directions
  4. 2024Enhanced document retrieval with topic embeddings
  5. 2025HiFi-RAG: Hierarchical Content Filtering and Two-Pass Generation for Open-Domain RAG
  6. 2026Revisiting RAG Retrievers: An Information Theoretic Benchmark
  7. 2026Bridge-RAG: An Abstract Bridge Tree Based Retrieval Augmented Generation Algorithm
  8. 2024ARAGOG: Advanced RAG Output Grading