Understanding Implicit Trust Errors in Core Carrier Networks through Multi-Agent Flaw Discovery and Analysis
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Cellular core networks (CNs) are critical infrastructure, yet their internal security model has historically relied on physical isolation: interfaces between core components often operate within an assumed trust zone. As CNs transition to cloud-native deployments, this assumption weakens, expanding the attack surface and enabling external adversaries to reach previously internal interfaces. From a root-cause analysis of security flaws reported in GitHub issues for opensource CN implementations, we found a recurring pattern of blind trust among CN components. Components may omit syntactic validation, fail to enforce semantic invariants, or allocate resources without checking availability. Once internal interfaces become reachable, these weaknesses can lead to severe impacts such as denial of service and session hijacking. We call these vulnerabilities implicit trust errors (iTrue). To detect iTrues and understand their security impacts, we designed iFinder, an LLM-driven multi-agent system that summarizes known flaws, distills them into detection patterns, and applies them to discover new iTrues in CN implementations. To suppress hallucinations produced by large language models (LLMs), we built an innovative strategy that crosschecks both 3GPP specifications and CN code to capture existing protection missed by the agents. Further, we developed a technique that uses LLMs to generate proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits for potential iTrues and iteratively refine the PoCs by automatically executing them against CN implementations and analyzing results. Running iFinder on seven prominent open-source CN implementations, we discovered 84 previously unknown vulnerabilities. Among them, 83 have already been confirmed and 81 have been assigned CVEs. Importantly, a session-hijacking flaw has been confirmed on real-world commercial 5G core networks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2026.
Builds on
16 of 60 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2026MulVul: Retrieval-augmented Multi-Agent Code Vulnerability Detection via Cross-Model Prompt Evolution26 Jan
- 2026Multi-Agent Taint Specification Extraction for Vulnerability Detection15 Jan
- 2025From CVE Entries to Verifiable Exploits: An Automated Multi-Agent Framework for Reproducing CVEs1 Sep
Other references · 13
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
- 2025LLMs in Software Security: A Survey of Vulnerability Detection Techniques and Insightscited by 44
- 2018Evaluating Fuzz Testingcited by 29
- 2026Synthesizing Multi-Agent Harnesses for Vulnerability Discoverycited by 11
- 2021StateAFL: Greybox Fuzzing for Stateful Network Serverscited by 4
- 2023Hermes: Unlocking Security Analysis of Cellular Network Protocols by Synthesizing Finite State Machines from Natural Language Specificationscited by 4
- 2020BaseSAFE: Baseband SAnitized Fuzzing through Emulationcited by 3
- 2024CellularLint: A Systematic Approach to Identify Inconsistent Behavior in Cellular Network Specificationscited by 3
- 2022Stateful Greybox Fuzzingcited by 1
- 2022Cloud-native 5G experimental platform with over-the-air transmissions and end-to-end monitoringcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Systems-Level Attack Surface of Edge Agent Deployments on IoT
- 2026Rethinking Side-Channel Analysis: Automated Discovery and Analysis of Side-Channel Leakage with LLM-Assisted Agents
- 2025Comprehensive Vulnerability Analysis is Necessary for Trustworthy LLM-MAS
- 2026Agent-Fence: Mapping Security Vulnerabilities Across Deep Research Agents
- 2026Breaking the Protocol: Security Analysis of the Model Context Protocol Specification and Prompt Injection Vulnerabilities in Tool-Integrated LLM Agents
- 2026A Security Analysis of the OpenClaw AI Agent Framework
- 2026InterSAGE: The Secure and Verifiable Interoperability Protocol for An Internet of Agents
- 2025Agentic Discovery and Validation of Android App Vulnerabilities