Interpreting Latent CoT Reasoning as Dynamical Systems
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent latent reasoning methods, such as CODI and COCONUT, face a fundamental interpretability problem: they maintain multiple superimposed candidate traces in the hidden space at each step, unlike explicit- CoT, which follows a single transparent reasoning trace. Existing mechanistic methods show compression, shortcuts, and superposition without explaining how reasoning evolves across latent steps. To address this gap, we model latent token sequences as trajectories in representation space and apply dynamical systems analysis to characterize the evolution of reasoning. Using quantitative measures, such as step-to-step change, direction consistency, and Lyapunov sensitivity, alongside qualitative projections, such as UMAP and DMD/PHATE, we show that latent CoT exhibits structured, non-random dynamics with two distinct stability classes. CODI behaves as a stable attractor, while COCONUT behaves as an unstable expanding system, and SIM-CoT supervision tightens both behaviors without changing the underlying dynamics. This framework advances the interpretability of latent CoT reasoning dynamics and provides actionable insights for improving latent reasoning performance. Code1 and Project page2 available online.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2026.
Builds on
9 of 16 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 8
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
- 2025CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-Distillationcited by 216
- 2025SIM-CoT: Supervised Implicit Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 63
- 2025Explainable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis on State-Aware Reasoning Dynamicscited by 16
- 2026Do Latent-CoT Models Think Step-by-Step? A Mechanistic Study on Sequential Reasoning Taskscited by 10
- 2026Dynamics Within Latent Chain-of-Thought: An Empirical Study of Causal Structurecited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026How Far Ahead Do LLMs Plan? Uncovering the Latent Horizon in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
- 2025A Statistical Physics of Language Model Reasoning
- 2026Equilibrium Reasoners: Learning Attractors Enables Scalable Reasoning
- 2026LaTER: Efficient Test-Time Reasoning via Latent Exploration and Explicit Verification
- 2025CTRLS: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Latent State-Transition
- 2025A Survey on Latent Reasoning
- 2026When to Re-Plan: Subgoal Persistence in Hierarchical Latent Reasoning
- 2026Monitoring the Internal Monologue: Probe Trajectories Reveal Reasoning Dynamics