mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Spectrally Deconfounded Gradient Boosting

arXiv 2607.09371 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Flexible machine-learning methods can be sensitive to hidden confounding: they may learn associations induced by unobserved confounders rather than stable signals. Spectral deconfounding mitigates this problem by shrinking high-variance directions of the covariate matrix that, under dense confounding, carry latent confounder information. Existing work has largely focused on linear models. We develop a nonlinear spectral deconfounding framework for gradient boosting. Our approach replaces the ordinary squared-error loss by a spectral loss, which alters the boosting dynamics by slowing down learning in confounding-aligned directions. We show that deconfounding is not achieved by the spectral loss alone, but by the interaction between spectral shrinkage and regularization, especially in terms of early stopping. Moreover, we provide a mixed-model interpretation that connects LAVA-type shrinkage to random-effects adjustment and yields an empirical-Bayes procedure for tuning the spectral loss. We also extend the method to general likelihoods and nonlinear confounding using Laplace approximations and kernel random effects. Across synthetic and real-world experiments, spectrally deconfounded boosting improves estimation of the target function under hidden confounding and is substantially more scalable than existing nonlinear spectral deconfounding baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.

Builds on

11 of 33 references.

References · 11

  1. 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 199
  2. 2020Gaussian Process Boostingcited by 26
  3. 2018Vecchia approximations of Gaussian-process predictionscited by 21
  4. 2018Spectral Deconfounding via Perturbed Sparse Linear Modelscited by 13
  5. 2020Doubly Debiased Lasso: High-Dimensional Inference under Hidden Confoundingcited by 9
  6. 2021Latent Gaussian Model Boostingcited by 9
  7. 2015A lava attack on the recovery of sums of dense and sparse signalscited by 6
  8. 2020Na"ive regression requires weaker assumptions than factor models to adjust for multiple cause confoundingcited by 5
  9. 2023Spectral Deconfounding for High-Dimensional Sparse Additive Modelscited by 3
  10. 2025Latent confounding in high-dimensional nonlinear modelscited by 1
  11. 2026Laplace Approximations for Mixed-Effects and Gaussian Process Quantile Regressioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.