GenVid2Robot: From Video Generation to Robot Manipulation via Rigid-Geometric Consistency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generated videos provide useful visual motion priors for robot manipulation, but their visual plausibility does not imply physical executability. A generated video usually lacks metric geometry, grasp grounding, robot kinematic feasibility, and execution-time feedback, which makes direct trajectory replay unreliable in real-world manipulation. This paper presents GenVid2Robot, a rigid-geometric consistency framework that converts generated video motion into executable real-robot manipulation trajectories. Given an initial RGB-D observation and a task instruction, GenVid2Robot samples task-relevant semantic anchors from the real first frame, tracks these anchors through generated video candidates, and verifies whether the resulting 2D motion can be explained by first-frame RGB-D anchors under a sparse relative SE(3) model. In this way, generated videos are treated as uncertain visual motion hypotheses rather than direct robot demonstrations. Only geometrically consistent motion is transferred to the robot. The accepted relative motion is then applied to the real grasp-time TCP pose selected by mask-constrained grasping, producing a grasp-conditioned execution trajectory that is consistent with both the visual motion prior and the physical grasp configuration. To reduce execution mismatch caused by RGB-D noise, calibration residuals, and small contact-induced displacement, a bounded depth-compensation module corrects local depth-direction errors without assuming full online replanning. Real-robot experiments demonstrate that GenVid2Robot improves the reliability of generated-video-guided manipulation by grounding visual motion priors with sparse metric geometry, grasp constraints, robot feasibility checking, and bounded execution feedback.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.
Builds on
16 of 21 references.
References · 16
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
- 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
- 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,490
- 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,172
- 2023VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Modelscited by 733
- 2023CoTracker: It is Better to Track Togethercited by 516
- 2023FoundationPose: Unified 6D Pose Estimation and Tracking of Novel Objectscited by 411
- 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation with Asynchronous Off-Policy Updatescited by 342
- 2024ReKep: Spatio-Temporal Reasoning of Relational Keypoint Constraints for Robotic Manipulationcited by 305
4 more
- 2022AnyGrasp: Robust and Efficient Grasp Perception in Spatial and Temporal Domainscited by 205
- 2013Data-Driven Grasp Synthesis - A Surveycited by 104
- 2025NovaFlow: Zero-Shot Manipulation via Actionable Flow from Generated Videoscited by 38
- 2025Robotic Manipulation by Imitating Generated Videos Without Physical Demonstrationscited by 33
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.