Weight-Space Physics: Interpretable Hypernetworks for Lattice Quantum Field Theories
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Lattice field theory is the workhorse of non-perturbative physics, used to simulate phenomena from the strong nuclear force to critical phenomena in materials. Its Boltzmann distributions are parametrized analytically by coupling constants, but these bare parameters are weak predictors of observables -- extracting physics typically requires extensive simulation. While normalizing flows have emerged as effective samplers at fixed couplings, it remains difficult to interpret what these networks have learned. This raises a natural question: can the physics be read off directly from the flow network parameters themselves, and can those parameters be generated for unseen theories? We propose lattice field theory as a testbed for neural network interpretability: because the target physics is qualitatively well-understood and smoothly varying, it provides ideal synthetic data with known ground truth. To this end, we introduce JEPAWG, a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture-based Weight Generator that maps couplings directly to flow weights via a learned latent space. On a scalar theory at lattices of size 62 to 112, the JEPAWG latent space recovers the correct intrinsic dimension of the underlying manifold, locates the phase transition, and encodes a finite-size shift aligned with the 2D Ising exponent nu ≈ 1, allowing us to uncover physical structure by studying the network weights alone. This suggests the fascinating idea of treating the network weights as a new type of physical observable. As a generator, JEPAWG also interpolates and extrapolates to unseen couplings effectively and remains robust to weight-space discontinuities introduced by multi-seed training data, outperforming PCA, AE, and VAE baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.
Builds on
15 of 25 references.
References · 15
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
- 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,003
- 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 982
- 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Videocited by 490
- 2019Continual learning with hypernetworkscited by 267
- 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 246
- 2019Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theorycited by 147
- 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networkscited by 126
- 2023A Brief Review of Hypernetworks in Deep Learningcited by 102
- 2017Bayesian Hypernetworkscited by 64
- 2025VL-JEPA: Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture for Vision-languagecited by 61
- 2022Learning Lattice Quantum Field Theories with Equivariant Continuous Flowscited by 37
3 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.