LLM-Guided Task-Semantic Field Factorization for Industrial Process Forecasting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Process industries rely on time-series forecasting and soft sensing to estimate quality variables that are hard to measure online. Labeled data are scarce, operating regimes change frequently, and retraining models or rebuilding alignment pipelines for each scenario is costly. Such settings often provide variable tables and process documents that record variable names, units, physical meanings, and process roles. However, standard time-series backbones usually treat inputs as anonymous numerical columns. Existing text-enhanced methods also rarely make the semantic-logical relations between input variables and the prediction target available to the model within each numerical window. To address this problem, this article proposes Task-Semantic Field Factorization (TSF), a large language model (LLM)-guided framework. TSF builds a task-semantic field from task protocols and variable documents before training and uses the LLM only for offline semantic construction. Online training and inference are handled by conventional time-series backbones. During training and inference, the current numerical window activates variable semantics, so semantic information participates in each prediction and supports adaptation to different prediction targets and operating shifts. Across multiple complex industrial forecasting and delayed soft-sensing tasks, TSF reduces MAE by 3.6% on average. Across all dataset--backbone pairs, the macro-average reduction is 2.9%, with a maximum reduction of 24.9%. It adds only about 0.7--4.3k parameters, with less than 8,μs/sample of additional online inference overhead. These results show that TSF turns existing process documents into measurable forecasting gains across backbones and semantic generators while remaining lightweight for deployment.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2026.
Builds on
14 of 36 references.
References · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,169
- 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 2,039
- 2023iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecastingcited by 931
- 2023Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Modelscited by 700
- 2023One Fits All:Power General Time Series Analysis by Pretrained LMcited by 632
- 2023Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasterscited by 500
- 2022PromptCast: A New Prompt-based Learning Paradigm for Time Series Forecastingcited by 172
- 2023TEST: Text Prototype Aligned Embedding to Activate LLM's Ability for Time Seriescited by 169
- 2024Are Language Models Actually Useful for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 168
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.