Empirical Minimal-Realisation Compression of Deep Neural Networks via Controllability-Observability Tests
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks often contain substantial hidden-state redundancy, but most compression methods operate directly on weights, neurons, or quantised representations without explicitly characterising the dynamical role of internal states. This paper proposes a controllability-observability framework for empirical state-order reduction of deep neural networks. By viewing a trained network as a depth-indexed nonlinear dynamical system, we construct data-driven reachability, observability, and balanced Gramians from hidden-state snapshots and output Jacobians. The resulting A/B/C tests estimate layer-wise reachable, observable, and jointly reachable--observable ranks. These ranks are then used not only as diagnostic measures of hidden-state redundancy, but also as actual compressed layer widths for realised reduced networks. Experiments on MNIST and CIFAR-10 compare the proposed balanced realisation against projection-based reduction, unstructured pruning, structured pruning, low-rank SVD, dynamic INT8 quantisation, and linear baselines. On MNIST, a four-layer SiLU DNN is reduced from state order 1024 to 277, giving 72.95% state compression and 73.48% parameter compression, while maintaining 95.45% accuracy compared with 96.60% for the full model. On CIFAR-10, a larger SiLU DNN is reduced from state order 4608 to 1339, giving 70.94% state compression and 83.09% parameter compression, while preserving accuracy from 54.45% to 54.44% and reducing CUDA inference latency by approximately 3X. The results show that balanced reachable-observable ranks provide a principled empirical minimal-realisation criterion for designing compact neural architectures with little or no loss in accuracy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2026.
Builds on
11 of 14 references.
References · 11
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
- 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 676
- 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 599
- 2017Stable Architectures for Deep Neural Networkscited by 341
- 2014Exploiting Linear Structure Within Convolutional Networks for Efficient Evaluationcited by 306
- 2018Deep Neural Networks Motivated by Partial Differential Equationscited by 187
- 2019Deep learning as optimal control problems: models and numerical methodscited by 34
Built on by
Not cited yet.