Language Models Represent and Transform Concepts with Shared Geometry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How concepts are represented in neural networks is a fundamental question in machine learning. The dominant view treats concept representations as stationary geometric objects. Yet concepts appear in context, and context transforms them. Drawing from neural population geometry, we formalize concept representations as point-cloud manifolds and contextual transformations as vector fields, and instantiate this framework in large language models. Across six model families of varying scales, we find that context moves each concept differently. The variance in these displacements is semantically organized, correlating with lexical concreteness and density. Importantly, both the concepts being transformed and this variance structure are shared across models: displacement structure transported from one model predicts held-out displacements in others significantly above chance. Together, these findings show that models share a common geometry not only in how concepts are represented, but more importantly in how context transforms them, a structure with richer organization than prior work has recognized.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2026.
Builds on
25 of 47 references.
References · 25
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
13 more
- 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 621
- 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 246
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 201
- 2018A mathematical theory of semantic development in deep neural networkscited by 182
- 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 151
- 2026Ministral 3cited by 88
- 2025Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddingscited by 54
- 2021Neural population geometry: An approach for understanding biological and artificial neural networkscited by 52
- 2022Datasheet for the Pilecited by 41
- 2026Revisiting the Platonic Representation Hypothesis: An Aristotelian Viewcited by 33
- 2024Implicit Geometry of Next-token Prediction: From Language Sparsity Patterns to Model Representationscited by 24
- 2025Revealing emergent human-like conceptual representations from language predictioncited by 5
- 2026The Representational Geometry of Numbercited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.