Compressing the Validation Bottleneck: An Agentic Self-Driving Lab for Scientific Discovery
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Agentic AI-for-Science can automate ideation, planning, and analysis, but final validation still depends on real experiments. A self-driving lab (SDL) can execute those experiments, yet the loop still has bottlenecks: the agent may spend too many rounds on low-value experiments, or each round may require a high-cost experiment. We target these two physical bottlenecks with one agent. First, a prior-aware agentic DOE loop uses domain knowledge and past results to propose feasible and informative next experiments, reducing trials-to-target. Second, a cost-aware surrogate agent predicts high-cost, high-resolution measurements from low-cost, low-resolution measurements. It chooses between a high- and a low-cost measurement based on the predicted uncertainty. We examine these directions in the biology and materials domains, respectively. Together, under a single agent, these components aim to accelerate the SDL loop by reducing both the number of loops and the cost per experiment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2026.
Builds on
13 of 31 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search10 Apr
Other references · 12
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
- 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
- 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 744
- 2023ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry toolscited by 631
- 2024Large Language Models to Enhance Bayesian Optimizationcited by 135
- 2025LLMs for Bayesian Optimization in Scientific Domains: Are We There Yet?cited by 14
- 2024Best Practices for Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization in Materials and Molecular Researchcited by 7
- 2026Unleashing LLMs in Bayesian Optimization: Preference-Guided Framework for Scientific Discoverycited by 7
- 2024Co-orchestration of Multiple Instruments to Uncover Structure-Property Relationships in Combinatorial Librariescited by 4
- 2025Machine learning of microstructure--property relationships in materials leveraging microstructure representation from foundational vision transformerscited by 3
- 2025Deep Gaussian Process-based Cost-Aware Batch Bayesian Optimization for Complex Materials Design Campaignscited by 2
- 2025Computational, Data-Driven, and Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approaches for Microstructure Modeling in Metal Additive Manufacturingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Agentic AI for Self-Driving Laboratories in Soft Matter: Taxonomy, Benchmarks,and Open Challenges
- 2026La Agente 'Optima: Towards Agentic Self-Driving Laboratories
- 2025Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions
- 2025From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery
- 2026A case study of evaluating AI agents on a neuroscience data-to-discovery pipeline
- 2026Agentic AI Scientists Are Not Built For Autonomous Scientific Discovery
- 2026LAP: An Agent-to-Instrument Protocol for Autonomous Science
- 2026The Greatness of Science Cannot Be Planned: Agentic Auto-Research is Fuzz Testing