Computational, Data-Driven, and Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approaches for Microstructure Modeling in Metal Additive Manufacturing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Metal additive manufacturing enables unprecedented design freedom and the production of customized, complex components. However, the rapid melting and solidification dynamics inherent to metal AM processes generate heterogeneous, non-equilibrium microstructures that significantly impact mechanical properties and subsequent functionality. Predicting microstructure and its evolution across spatial and temporal scales remains a central challenge for process optimization and defect mitigation. While conventional experimental techniques and physics-based simulations provide a physical foundation and valuable insights, they face critical limitations. In contrast, data-driven machine learning offers an alternative prediction approach and powerful pattern recognition but often operate as black-box, lacking generalizability and physical consistency. To overcome these limitations, physics-informed machine learning, including physics-informed neural networks, has emerged as a promising paradigm by embedding governing physical laws into neural network architectures, thereby enhancing accuracy, transparency, data efficiency, and extrapolation capabilities. This work presents a comprehensive evaluation of modeling strategies for microstructure prediction in metal AM. The strengths and limitations of experimental, computational, and data-driven methods are analyzed in depth, and highlight recent advances in hybrid PIML frameworks that integrate physical knowledge with ML. Key challenges, such as data scarcity, multi-scale coupling, and uncertainty quantification, are discussed alongside future directions. Ultimately, this assessment underscores the importance of PIML-based hybrid approaches in enabling predictive, scalable, and physically consistent microstructure modeling for site-specific, microstructure-aware process control and the reliable production of high-performance AM components.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 146 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2025.
Builds on
12 of 146 references.
References · 12
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,318
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 332
- 2024From PINNs to PIKANs: Recent Advances in Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 73
- 2022Failure-informed adaptive sampling for PINNscited by 64
- 2022MeltpoolNet: Melt pool Characteristic Prediction in Metal Additive Manufacturing Using Machine Learningcited by 19
- 2022Hybrid thermal modeling of additive manufacturing processes using physics-informed neural networks for temperature prediction and parameter identificationcited by 14
- 2024GrainGNN: A dynamic graph neural network for predicting 3D grain microstructurecited by 8
- 2023Review of Machine Learning Methods for Additive Manufacturing of Functionally Graded Materialscited by 4
- 2024Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Smart Additive Manufacturingcited by 3
- 2023Physics-Informed Machine Learning of Argon Gas-Driven Melt Pool Dynamicscited by 2
- 2024Thermal-Mechanical Physics Informed Deep Learning For Fast Prediction of Thermal Stress Evolution in Laser Metal Depositioncited by 2
- 2020Tusas: A fully implicit parallel approach for coupled phase-field equationscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.