mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quadrature-Aware Complex-Linear Neural Operator for Boundary-to-Field Prediction in Resonant Acoustics

arXiv 2607.04407 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2026physics.flu-dyn cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Repeated prediction of acoustic fields from spatially distributed boundary excitation is computationally expensive when each source realization requires a new wave simulation. This work introduces a quadrature-aware complex-linear boundary operator (CLBO) that maps complex normal velocity on a vibrating surface to complex pressure at receiver locations. The model couples learned source and receiver basis functions through an explicit complex surface-quadrature contraction, so the boundary excitation enters linearly by construction. This preserves complex superposition, homogeneity, and zero response to zero excitation, while representing the source through coordinates, normals, and quadrature weights rather than a fixed flattened input vector. Reference data were generated using a verified three-dimensional multiple-relaxation-time (MRT) lattice Boltzmann solver and stored in a solver-agnostic boundary-to-field format. CLBO was compared with a fixed-sensor complex DeepONet under matched case splits and optimization settings, with additional tests of structural consistency, receiver-coordinate interpolation, source discretization, source-family holdout, label efficiency, physics-informed ablations, unseen source mixtures, and computational cost. Across five training seeds, CLBO achieved a mean complex relative field error of 0.184 +/- 0.00771, compared with 0.367 +/- 0.00742 for DeepONet. Its measured source-superposition error was 1.31 x 10^-7, and its mean error on newly simulated mixed-source cases was 0.237, compared with 0.415 for DeepONet. Inference was 1.83 x 10^4 faster than the reference calculation for the reported query size. These results show that enforcing the known complex-linear boundary-to-field structure improves physical consistency and generalization under distributed acoustic excitation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 46 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  3. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
  4. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  5. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,394
  6. 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 840
  7. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
  8. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
  9. 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 293
  10. 2017Deep Complex Networkscited by 215
  11. 2022Learning Neural Acoustic Fieldscited by 65
  12. 2023Sound propagation in realistic interactive 3D scenes with parameterized sources using deep neural operatorscited by 12
6 more
  1. 2023Learning Only On Boundaries: a Physics-Informed Neural operator for Solving Parametric Partial Differential Equations in Complex Geometriescited by 12
  2. 2024Room impulse response reconstruction with physics-informed deep learningcited by 10
  3. 2024Kernel Neural Operators (KNOs) for Scalable, Memory-efficient, Geometrically-flexible Operator Learningcited by 10
  4. 2021Physics-informed neural networks for one-dimensional sound field predictions with parameterized sources and impedance boundariescited by 7
  5. 2025SVD-NO: Learning PDE Solution Operators with SVD Integral Kernelscited by 3
  6. 2024Sound Field Reconstruction Using a Compact Acoustics-informed Neural Networkcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.