Agentic SABRE: An Uncertainty-Aware Neuro-Symbolic Multi-Agent Framework for Adaptive Ransomware Detection
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Ransomware has evolved into a complex, adaptive, and fast-moving adversary category in which static signatures and monolithic classifiers fail to generalise under concept drift, evasion, and behavioural polymorphism. In this paper, we present Agentic SABRE (Semantic-Behavioural Arbitration for Ransomware Evaluation), an uncertainty-aware, neuro-symbolic, multi-agent framework for adaptive ransomware detection. SABRE fuses semantic, representation-based evidence with behavioural, time-window forensic telemetry and employs Monte Carlo Dropout inference to quantify epistemic uncertainty for each agent. We introduce a decision-layer orchestrator that performs risk- and uncertainty-aware triage using two interpretable thresholds: a risk score and an uncertainty budget. High-confidence, high-risk samples are automatically contained, while uncertain or borderline cases are escalated to human analysts, establishing a flexible computational contract between autonomous response and analyst oversight. To support auditability and trust, SABRE integrates post-hoc explainability mechanisms, including gradient saliency, permutation importance, and counterfactual analysis, enabling both local and global interpretation of agent decisions. Extensive evaluation on RDset and RanSMAP demonstrates that Agentic SABRE preserves perfect discrimination on saturated semantic datasets, with AUC equal to 1.0, while improving robustness under weak behavioural signals. It achieves up to a 4.9 percent relative reduction in false escalations at equal recall while maintaining calibrated predictive uncertainty. Counterfactual analysis further shows that semantic and behavioural decisions can be reversed with bounded perturbation cost, indicating stable and interpretable decision boundaries.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2026.
Builds on
10 of 32 references.
References · 10
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,430
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 698
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 676
- 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 195
- 2023A Multi-Agent Adaptive Deep Learning Framework for Online Intrusion Detectioncited by 5
- 2025Exploring the Role of Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Surveycited by 5
- 2024CANAL -- Cyber Activity News Alerting Language Model: Empirical Approach vs. Expensive LLMcited by 4
- 2024Bayesian Learned Models Can Detect Adversarial Malware For Freecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Cost-Aware Hierarchical Multi-Agent Ransomware Detection and Family Attribution
- 2026Quantifiable Uncertainty: A Stochastic Consensus Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Robust Malware Detection
- 2026Privacy-Aware Machine Unlearning with SISA for Reinforcement Learning-Based Ransomware Detection
- 2026Multimodal Multi-Agent Ransomware Analysis Using AutoGen
- 2026HunterAgent: Neuro-Symbolic Attack Trace Reconstruction under Anti-Forensics
- 2026Spider-Sense: Intrinsic Risk Sensing for Efficient Agent Defense with Hierarchical Adaptive Screening
- 2026Dissecting Agentic Forensics: The Role of Triage, Prompting, and Evidence Arbitration in Open-World Fake Image Detection
- 2026AgenticVM: Agentic AI for Adaptive Software Vulnerability Management