mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Telescope: Improving Zero Shot Detection of LLM Generated Content By Measuring Token Repetition Probability

arXiv 2607.04061 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distinguishing Large Language Model (LLM) generated text from human writing is a critical and difficult challenge. While LLMs are trained to write like humans, we hypothesize that this training leaves an indelible mark. LLMs develop a particularly strong aversion to token repetition very early in training. This bias persists as a ''Vestigial Heuristic'' (a developmental artifact) that is activated in LLM-generated text, separating LLM from human writing. To probe this phenomenon, we introduce Telescope Perplexity, a metric that evaluates the token repetition of the model, P(si | s1:i) . Our empirical investigation reveals that the Telescope Perplexity signature emerges early in pre-training, and Telescope Perplexity empirically enables highly effective zero-shot LLM detection. We show state-of-the-art or competitive performance across diverse datasets (including modern evaluation sets we introduce), reference models, and perturbation schemes with greater efficiency than other methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2026.

Builds on

30 of 44 references.

References · 30

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  5. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
  6. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  7. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  8. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
  9. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  10. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  11. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  12. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
18 more
  1. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
  2. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
  3. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 175
  4. 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 130
  5. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
  6. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 101
  7. 2023LLM360: Towards Fully Transparent Open-Source LLMscited by 100
  8. 2024Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabularycited by 75
  9. 2019Large Scale Structure of Neural Network Loss Landscapescited by 68
  10. 2021The Grammar-Learning Trajectories of Neural Language Modelscited by 36
  11. 2023HC3 Plus: A Semantic-Invariant Human ChatGPT Comparison Corpuscited by 33
  12. 2024Neural Networks Learn Statistics of Increasing Complexitycited by 30
  13. 2024Inspection and Control of Self-Generated-Text Recognition Ability in Llama3-8b-Instructcited by 15
  14. 2024From Deception to Detection: The Dual Roles of Large Language Models in Fake Newscited by 11
  15. 2024A Practical Examination of AI-Generated Text Detectors for Large Language Modelscited by 11
  16. 2024LLMs Among Us: Generative AI Participating in Digital Discoursecited by 9
  17. 2025A Training-free Method for LLM Text Attributioncited by 4
  18. 2025An Empirical Study to Understand How Students Use ChatGPT for Writing Essayscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.