NormWorlds-CF: Solver-Verified Counterfactual Normative Reasoning with Metamorphic-Relation GRPO
On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models can reach the right normative verdict for the wrong reason. We introduce NormWorlds-CF, a solver-verified environment for counterfactual normative reasoning in executable rule worlds. Its deterministic solver produces final answers, proof and falsification certificates, argument statuses, support sets, and paired-world change labels, enabling supervision and evaluation without LLM judges. The benchmark contains staged SFT diagnostics and a compact paired-world task with 270 root families and 1080 canonical-to-variant pairs. The SFT diagnostics show that final-answer supervision can saturate verdict accuracy without inducing falsification competence: answer-only SFT reaches perfect answer accuracy but scores zero on joint falsification certificates, while full-mix training with targeted replay reaches strong all-task accuracy (0.99). For the structured-change task, we introduce metamorphic-relation GRPO (MR-GRPO), a class-conditioned reward for GRPO that gives partial credit for relation families and solver-visible change fields. In matched Qwen3-1.7B continuation experiments, MR-GRPO improves held-out relation accuracy and relation-family correctness, and reduces wrong-family error, compared to sparse and answer-only GRPO. In Qwen3-4B three-seed validation, sparse reward preserves coarse relation labels best, answer-only reward improves answer-change but weakens relation-family structure, and MR-GRPO leads on answer-, support-, and status-change fields as well as class-conditioned MR and change-presence. These results show that verified counterfactual structure can shape post-training beyond final answers, while exact full change-record generation, invariant subtype recognition, and out-of-distribution (OOD) transfer remain open problems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2026.
Builds on
28 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 27
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
- 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
- 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 411
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 366
15 more
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 336
- 2020ProofWriter: Generating Implications, Proofs, and Abductive Statements over Natural Languagecited by 324
- 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 314
- 2021LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in Englishcited by 310
- 2020Transformers as Soft Reasoners over Languagecited by 270
- 2024SaulLM-7B: A pioneering Large Language Model for Lawcited by 142
- 2023Chatlaw: A Multi-Agent Legal Assistant based on a Role-Aligned Mixture-of-Experts Architecturecited by 122
- 2023DISC-LawLLM: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Intelligent Legal Servicescited by 120
- 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domaincited by 118
- 2023LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Modelscited by 117
- 2020Metamorphic Testing: A New Approach for Generating Next Test Casescited by 75
- 2022RobustLR: Evaluating Robustness to Logical Perturbation in Deductive Reasoningcited by 22
- 2024Metamorphic Relation Generation: State of the Art and Visions for Future Researchcited by 3
- 2025Normative Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comparative Benchmark from Logical and Modal Perspectivescited by 3
- 2026OpenExempt: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Legal Reasoning and a Framework for Creating Custom Benchmarks on Demandcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Causal Consistency Regularization: Training Verifiably Sensitive Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2026ArgGYM: A Procedural, Engine-Verified Benchmark for Structured Defeasible Reasoning
- 2026Counterexample Generation via Per-Theorem Symbolic Verifiers: When Imitation Hurts and Reinforcement Repairs
- 2026Sequent-Prover: Training Agents for Formal, Checkable SMT-based Reasoning
- 2026RFEval: Benchmarking Reasoning Faithfulness under Counterfactual Reasoning Intervention in Large Reasoning Models
- 2026VERDICT: Training-Free Step-Wise Verification of Multimodal Reasoning via Disagreement-Aware Consensus
- 2026Theoria: Rewrite-Acceptability Verification over Informal Reasoning States
- 2026A Reference-Free Score for Detecting Silent Reasoning Failures in Large Language Models