A Near-Linear-Time Solver for Graph p-Laplacian Semi-Supervised Learning via Continuation in p
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph-based semi-supervised learning (SSL) propagates a few labels over a similarity graph by minimizing a Dirichlet-type energy. The standard quadratic (p=2) energy reduces to a single graph-Laplacian solve, but it degenerates exactly where SSL is most useful when labels are scarce: gathering more unlabeled data drives the p=2 estimate to a near-constant function whenever d≥2 (Nadler-Srebro-Zhou). Well-posedness requires the nonlinear p-Laplacian energy with p>d. Existing solvers reduce this to a sequence of weighted Laplacian solves, but their reference implementations use a direct sparse factorization or ichol-preconditioned CG instead. Plugging a near-linear Laplacian solver is not straightforward: at large p the conductance weights degenerate near flat-gradient edges, making the system nearly singular and causing stagnation without a damped outer iteration. We close this gap. Recasting p-Laplacian SSL as a source-form nonlinear Laplacian flow Bρp(B^top x)=b and solving by damped chord-Newton continuation in p, every linearized system stays well-conditioned and can be delegated to a near-linear Laplacian engine. On size-scaled graph families the wall-clock is empirically m0.96-m1.02 per family (approximate Cholesky default), and a pooled fit across 228 SuiteSparse graphs gives m1.19 vs. m1.45 for direct factorization; the solver handles a 6.8×107-edge social network in minutes. Memory is the binding constraint: Cholesky fill reaches 10-280× the graph nonzeros vs. our O(m) hierarchy. Against the released FCL solver we are 1.5-14× faster at matched accuracy. On MNIST 10-NN, p=3 scores 64% at one label per class vs. 36% for p=2. Code: https://github.com/orenlivne/np.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.
Builds on
12 of 21 references.
References · 12
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 315
- 2020Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models Out-performs Graph Neural Networkscited by 202
- 2020Poisson Learning: Graph Based Semi-Supervised Learning At Very Low Label Ratescited by 49
- 2017Analysis of p-Laplacian Regularization in Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 39
- 2022Maximum Flow and Minimum-Cost Flow in Almost-Linear Timecited by 28
- 2016Approximate Gaussian Elimination for Laplacians: Fast, Sparse, and Simplecited by 23
- 2017The game theoretic p-Laplacian and semi-supervised learning with few labelscited by 22
- 2016Asymptotic behavior of ℓp-based Laplacian regularization in semi-supervised learningcited by 16
- 2023Resurrecting Label Propagation for Graphs with Heterophily and Label Noisecited by 12
- 2019Flows in Almost Linear Time via Adaptive Preconditioningcited by 4
- 2026The dual IRLS scheme for (hyper-)graph p-Laplacians and ℓp regression with large exponentscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.