Self-Specializing Vision-Language Transmon Chip Calibration in a Physics-Grounded Environment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Calibrating a superconducting transmon chip is a sequential decision problem under noise, drift, and a finite budget: an expert must choose experiments, read ambiguous plots, judge fit quality, and revise stale beliefs as the chip drifts. We study whether a vision-language agent can close this loop and specialize itself to one physical device without weight updates, via three co-designed artifacts. The first is a physics-grounded simulation environment for transmon chips: calibration observables derive from circuit-quantized parameters via scqubits, with realistic flux-line distortion, wall-time-scaled and mid-scan drift, and gate leakage, concerns a toy simulator would omit; each tool call advances a modeled clock so drift accrues by wall time, not call count. The second is a vision-language agent that runs the loop end to end, calling tools, reading plots, maintaining a structured notebook, and submitting parameters without hidden truth, scored against hidden parameters and gate fidelities measured on the device. The third is gradient-free online adaptation: a reflector reads truth-free anomaly signatures from past attempts and grows a small, human-readable device note appended to the prompt, admitted by a paired-snapshot accept gate that isolates strategy improvement from drift. On a hard-tier chip under budget pressure, six iterations raised the worst-case CZ fidelity from 0.678 to 0.787 and cut its variance, reproducing at four-qubit scale; a single accepted note raised CZ fidelity from 0.678 to 0.913 on its paired snapshot. A planted-fault study confirms the note is causal, diagnosing a hardware fault truth-free, its principal value raising the failure floor and cutting variance. The agent, scoring, and reward transfer to real hardware via a measurement-backend swap; only the accept gate is a simulation affordance, reducing to a held-out-slice or repeat-and-average form.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.
Builds on
7 of 29 references.
References · 7
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
- 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,332
- 2023ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry toolscited by 631
- 2026QCalEval: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Quantum Calibration Plot Understandingcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Agentic TCAD Calibration Workflow for Oxide Semiconductor Transistors
- 2026Quantum Circuit Vision: Cost-Aware Evaluation of Visual AI Agents for Quantum Code Generation
- 2026Long-Horizon Analog Design Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hours-Long Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design Tasks
- 2026Graph Reinforcement Learning for Calibration-Aware Quantum Circuit Routing
- 2026From Mirage to Grounding: Towards Reliable Multimodal Circuit-to-Verilog Code Generation
- 2024Parameter-Efficient Quantized Mixture-of-Experts Meets Vision-Language Instruction Tuning for Semiconductor Electron Micrograph Analysis
- 2026Onnes: A Physics-Grounded Multi-Agent LLM Simulator for Cryogenic Fault Diagnosis in Quantum Computing Infrastructure
- 2026Open-Source LLM-Driven Formal Verification: A Multi-Agent Pipeline for RTL Repair