mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding electricity consumption behaviour through Inverse Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2607.03176 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding how households consume electricity in response to socioeconomic and climatic drivers is important for decision-makers designing energy policies in a changing climate and under geopolitical tensions. Consumers respond differently to thermal stress depending on income, consumption habits and the surrounding built environment, a nonlinear behaviour that most approaches oversimplify. In this study, households are treated as agents interacting with complex environments, and Inverse Reinforcement Learning is used to represent their consumption behaviour as model implied reward functions. Specifically, we observe how these reward functions change when households undergo socioeconomic and climatic shocks. The framework is tested on different clusters of electricity consumption profiles in Italy. Clusters' reward functions are retrieved and used to understand how cooling behaviour changes from summer 2021 to summer 2022 and 2023, before, during and after the energy crisis and a heatwave. We find that these shocks reshaped cooling behaviour heterogeneously across consumer groups, in directions conditioned by their prior habits and built environment. Across the 2021 to 2023 summers, we identify a spectrum of responses: transient adjustments that receded as the shocks eased, durable shifts persisting into 2023, and consumers exhibiting negligible change. At the intradaily scale, groups comparable in socioeconomic and environmental context but differing in their daily timing of consumption responded distinctly, identifying time of use as a separate dimension of behavioural heterogeneity. Energy policies and demand-response schemes should therefore account not only for who consumers are and where they live, but for when they consume and whether their response to a shock persists.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.

Builds on

9 of 67 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  3. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
  4. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  5. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  6. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  7. 2017Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 460
  8. 2017Geometric GANcited by 232
  9. 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 184

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Uncovering Utility Functions from Observed Outcomes
  2. 2025Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Switching Rewards and History Dependency for Characterizing Animal Behaviors
  3. 2021Offline-Online Reinforcement Learning for Energy Pricing in Office Demand Response: Lowering Energy and Data Costs
  4. 2019Modeling and Interpreting Real-world Human Risk Decision Making with Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026Large Language Model-Driven Context-Aware Eco-Feedback Generation and Evaluation
  6. 2026LoaDiff: Conditional Generation of Electricity Consumption Time Series for Energy Analytics
  7. 2025Can Large Language Models Simulate Human Responses? A Case Study of Stated Preference Experiments in the Context of Heating-related Choices
  8. 2025Efficient Inference for Inverse Reinforcement Learning and Dynamic Discrete Choice Models