Observable- and Positional-Encoding-Dependent Symmetry Readout from Neural Network Weights
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-hoc analysis of trained neural network weights often seeks to recover geometric structure directly from the parameters. We show that, for positional-encoding-equipped neural fields, the symmetry visible from weights is not the true symmetry group itself, but an observable symmetry set determined by the trained parameters, the positional encoding (PE), and readout observable. We formulate this dependence through an exact observability hierarchy, Gobsexact subseteq Gliftexact(φ) cap Gtrue, where Gliftexact(φ) is the set of input transformations that the PE can exactly lift to the feature space. The hierarchy implies that even when a target function has a geometric symmetry, that symmetry may be structurally invisible to weight-level observables if the PE does not represent the corresponding transformation. We test this prediction using MLPs trained on two-dimensional signed distance functions with multiple shape symmetry groups, positional encodings, and Gram-based observables. The results show a consistent PE-dependent pattern: DyadicAxisPE supports D4-sensitive readout but structurally suppresses D3 rotations, TriAxisPE yields lower D3 / D6 readout scores under the tested Gram observables by replacing coordinate axes with three 120-degree-separated axes, and random Fourier features mainly exhibit a π-rotation response under these readouts. These findings show that PE design affects not only approximation behavior but also which structures are accessible to post-hoc weight-level readouts. This provides a basis for a principled observable-dependent symmetry readout.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.
Builds on
19 of 25 references.
References · 19
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
- 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,165
- 2021E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 965
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 763
- 2019General E(2)-Equivariant Steerable CNNscited by 446
- 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 405
- 2022From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like onecited by 187
- 2023Equivariant Architectures for Learning in Deep Weight Spacescited by 107
7 more
- 2021Automatic Symmetry Discovery with Lie Algebra Convolutional Networkcited by 83
- 2022On the Symmetries of Deep Learning Models and their Internal Representationscited by 64
- 2023Deep Learning on Implicit Neural Representations of Shapescited by 63
- 2025Symmetry in Neural Network Parameter Spacescited by 36
- 2022LieGG: Studying Learned Lie Group Generatorscited by 31
- 2025Parameter Symmetry Potentially Unifies Deep Learning Theorycited by 12
- 2024Symmetry Discovery for Different Data Typescited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.