mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

VERITAS: Towards a General-Purpose Replication Tool for Scientific Research

arXiv 2607.02931 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI tools are accelerating scientific publication while the systems that review it struggle to keep up, and independent verification of published research has become both harder and more important. As manual replication is slow and expensive, a growing line of work uses coding agents to automate parts of the process. Existing efforts are largely packaged as benchmarks with companion agents that only run inside the benchmark's own pipeline, and no general-purpose replication tool exists. We present VERITAS, a domain-agnostic replication framework built around CLI coding agents. Given a paper, a code repository, or both, VERITAS extracts the paper's claims, runs the methodology while resolving issues as they arise, and judges each claim against the evidence from experiment runs. The pipeline returns an importance-weighted Replication Score, a severity-rated log of every fix applied, and the patched codebase. We evaluate VERITAS on CORE-Bench and ReplicationBench, 65 papers spanning computer science, social science, medicine, and astrophysics. Against two strong Claude Code baselines on the same model and host environment, VERITAS achieves state-of-the-art performance and leads on every metric on both benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.

Builds on

15 of 31 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  2. 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 585
  3. 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 321
  4. 2024CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmarkcited by 123
  5. 2025Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluationcited by 92
  6. 2025Paper2Code: Automating Code Generation from Scientific Papers in Machine Learningcited by 70
  7. 2025AutoReproduce: Automatic AI Experiment Reproduction with Paper Lineagecited by 32
  8. 2025REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?cited by 21
  9. 2025RExBench: Can coding agents autonomously implement AI research extensions?cited by 18
  10. 2026Compound Deception in Elite Peer Review: A Failure Mode Taxonomy of 100 Fabricated Citations at NeurIPS 2025cited by 15
  11. 2024AstroM3: A self-supervised multimodal model for astronomycited by 11
  12. 2026ReplicatorBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Replicability in Social and Behavioral Sciencescited by 9
3 more
  1. 2026The Story is Not the Science: Execution-Grounded Evaluation of Mechanistic Interpretability Researchcited by 6
  2. 2026Read the Paper, Write the Code: Agentic Reproduction of Social-Science Resultscited by 5
  3. 2026PaperRepro: Automated Computational Reproducibility Assessment for Social Science Paperscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ReplicationBench: Can AI Agents Replicate Astrophysics Research Papers?
  2. 2026Coding-agents can replicate scientific machine learning papers
  3. 2026ResearchClawBench: A Benchmark for End-to-End Autonomous Scientific Research
  4. 2026Autonomous Research Agents: A Survey of AI Scientists and the Verification Gap
  5. 2025From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code Masking
  6. 2026Overview of the NLPCC 2026 Shared Task 11: Agent-Based Experiment Reproduction from Scientific Papers
  7. 2026SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment
  8. 2026YouRA: A Persistent-State Architecture for Evidence-Traceable Autonomous Research Agents