HaloGuard 1.0: An Open Weights Constitutional Classifier for Multilingual AI Safety
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present HaloGuard 1.0, an open-weights implementation of the constitutional-classifier paradigm for input safety. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on English and multilingual prompt-safety benchmarks at roughly one-tenth the model size of current leading open guard models. The safety constitution is the organising structure of the corpus: a natural-language constitution of 46 policies and 2,940 subcategories drives synthetic data generation, with exhaustive one-to-one paired counterfactuals that hold topic and vocabulary fixed while flipping intent, a two-tier harmless design that separately targets boundary and baseline false positives (FPs), and balanced multilingual materialisation across 46 languages that treats language as a surface form appearing on both sides of the boundary rather than as an adversarial signal. Across seven prompt-safety benchmarks, HaloGuard 1.0-0.8B attains the best average F1 (90.9) of any open guard we evaluate, outperforming baselines up to 27B parameters (over 30 times larger) while holding false-positive rate (FPR) to 4.3 and false-negative rate (FNR) to 9.5. The HaloGuard 1.0-4B variant reaches average F1 of 92.1 and FPR of 3.5, spending its extra capacity on precision rather than recall. A structured adjudication of the remaining failures indicates that most apparent missed-harm cases are benchmark mislabels rather than genuine model misses. An always-on adversarial red-teaming protocol continuously hardens the guard against both content-level and agentic attacks. We release the models as open weights.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.
Builds on
8 of 14 references.
References · 8
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
- 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 477
- 2024WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMscited by 460
- 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
- 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 224
- 2025Constitutional Classifiers: Defending against Universal Jailbreaks across Thousands of Hours of Red Teamingcited by 172
- 2025PolyGuard: A Multilingual Safety Moderation Tool for 17 Languagescited by 57
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025X-Guard: Multilingual Guard Agent for Content Moderation
- 2025MrGuard: A Multilingual Reasoning Guardrail for Universal LLM Safety
- 2026CourtGuard: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Zero-Shot Policy Adaptation in LLM Safety
- 2025OMNIGUARD: An Efficient Approach for AI Safety Moderation Across Languages and Modalities
- 2026SalamahBench: Toward Standardized Safety Evaluation for Arabic Language Models
- 2026Safe responses matter: Output-aware safety guardrail mitigate over-refusal in MLLMs
- 2026Multilingual Safety Alignment Via Sparse Weight Editing
- 2026BabelSteering: Multilingual Safety Alignment via English Steering Vectors