Balancing Expressivity and Learnability in Quantum Kernel Bandit Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate Gaussian process (GP) bandit optimization with quantum kernels, assuming the mean reward function lies in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) induced by the quantum kernel. This setting is motivated by NISQ-era tasks such as quantum control, state preparation and variational quantum algorithms. While quantum kernels can offer a `quantum advantage' via domain-specific inductive biases, na"ively using full, high-dimensional kernels increases model complexity and information gain, leading to higher cumulative regret and poor learnability. To address this, we propose projected quantum kernels and classical kernel approximation techniques that reduce feature dimensionality while preserving key quantum properties. Using these approximate kernels, we develop misspecified GP bandit algorithms and derive regret bounds that characterize the trade-off between approximation error and information gain. The regret bounds provide principled guidance for selecting the optimal model complexity. Empirically, our methods outperform full quantum kernels in sample efficiency, while substantially reducing computational overhead, enabling scalable GP optimization for quantum-native applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
31 of 52 references.
References · 31
- 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
- 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
- 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 328
- 2021Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training datacited by 214
- 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
- 2020Beyond UCB: Optimal and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Regression Oraclescited by 195
- 2020Noise-Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 192
- 2018Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalencescited by 188
- 2020Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Errorcited by 180
- 2013Finite-Time Analysis of Kernelised Contextual Banditscited by 177
19 more
- 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 90
- 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 89
- 2018What Doubling Tricks Can and Can't Do for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 69
- 2021High-Dimensional Experimental Design and Kernel Banditscited by 55
- 2021Misspecified Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 52
- 2020Efficient and Robust Algorithms for Adversarial Linear Contextual Banditscited by 42
- 2020Quantum exploration algorithms for multi-armed banditscited by 22
- 2022Quantum Multi-Armed Bandits and Stochastic Linear Bandits Enjoy Logarithmic Regretscited by 19
- 2020Quantum Banditscited by 18
- 2023Quantum Bayesian Optimizationcited by 12
- 2023A Unified Framework for Trace-induced Quantum Kernelscited by 12
- 2023Quantum Gaussian Process Regression for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 9
- 2023Quantum Heavy-tailed Banditscited by 7
- 2024Physics-Informed Bayesian Optimization of Variational Quantum Circuitscited by 7
- 2020Approximation Theory Based Methods for RKHS Banditscited by 6
- 2019Improving the dynamics of quantum sensors with reinforcement learningcited by 3
- 2022Faster variational quantum algorithms with quantum kernel-based surrogate modelscited by 3
- 2023Multi-Armed Bandits and Quantum Channel Oraclescited by 3
- 2025Variational Quantum Optimization with Continuous Banditscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.