Diffeomorphic Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative models learn data distributions that reside on a low-dimensional manifold within a higher-dimensional ambient space. Optimizing differentiable objectives on this manifold is challenging: the ambient loss landscape is high-dimensional, rugged, and non-convex. Direct gradient descent, blind to the manifold's geometry, quickly drifts off it. Diffeomorphic optimization starts from the observation that diffusion and flow models provide a map from the data manifold to a much simpler base space in which we perform gradient descent. Using differential geometry, we show this is equivalent to Riemannian gradient descent on the data manifold up to O(λ2) corrections, keeping trajectories on-manifold by construction and yielding a smoother optimization surface. For protein design, we extend diffeomorphic optimization to the matrix Lie groups SO(3) and SE(3), deriving an autograd-compatible SO(3) gradient and a generalized adjoint-state method for backpropagation through Lie-group ODE solvers. Diffeomorphic optimization improves over tuned guidance on secondary-structure targeting with FrameFlow (91.3% vs. 63.3% of residues in the Ramachandran target), outperforms OC-Flow on peptide binding affinity at 2× the speed, and reduces Rosetta energies by thousands of units across the PDB test set for structures with hundreds of residues.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
27 of 53 references.
References · 27
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,717
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 964
- 2023Directly Fine-Tuning Diffusion Models on Differentiable Rewardscited by 431
- 2023Universal Guidance for Diffusion Modelscited by 426
- 2022DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Dockingcited by 307
- 2024Flow Matching Guide and Codecited by 291
- 2018Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negativescited by 261
- 2022Diffusion probabilistic modeling of protein backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problemcited by 229
- 2023Practical and Asymptotically Exact Conditional Sampling in Diffusion Modelscited by 218
- 2023SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generationcited by 214
15 more
- 2025A General Framework for Inference-time Scaling and Steering of Diffusion Modelscited by 201
- 2020Riemannian Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 143
- 2019Towards Realistic Individual Recourse and Actionable Explanations in Black-Box Decision Making Systemscited by 128
- 2020Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spherescited by 117
- 2024D-Flow: Differentiating through Flows for Controlled Generationcited by 115
- 2024AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensemblescited by 105
- 2020Neural Manifold Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 81
- 2021Efficient and Accurate Gradients for Neural SDEscited by 68
- 2023Monte Carlo guided Diffusion for Bayesian linear inverse problemscited by 65
- 2022Verifying the Union of Manifolds Hypothesis for Image Datacited by 62
- 2022Diffeomorphic Counterfactuals with Generative Modelscited by 29
- 2024Training Free Guided Flow Matching with Optimal Controlcited by 23
- 2024Hardness of Learning Neural Networks under the Manifold Hypothesiscited by 18
- 2026Enhanced Diffusion Sampling: Efficient Rare Event Sampling and Free Energy Calculation with Diffusion Modelscited by 11
- 2024Bridging discrete and continuous state spaces: Exploring the Ehrenfest process in time-continuous diffusion modelscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.