mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Low Perplexity is Repetition: A One-Dimensional Self-Conditioning Attractor in Continuous Diffusion LMs

arXiv 2607.00588 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: Diffusion models → Discrete and text diffusion

Abstract (arXiv)

Continuous diffusion language models offer an alternative to autoregressive generation, but their generations may suffer from repetition. We find that unconditional generations from ELF, a recent family of continuous diffusion language models, are more repetitive than human text, while Gen-PPL, a common likelihood-based metric, gives lower perplexity to repetitive generations and can conceal this problem while biasing quality evaluation. Our analysis links this behavior to a self-conditioning feedback loop in which clean-embedding predictions are repeatedly carried into subsequent denoising steps, driving representations toward an effectively one-dimensional contractive attractor associated with repetition. Based on this mechanism, we introduce Attractor-Contrast-Escape (ACE), a training-free inference-time intervention that estimates a repetition direction by contrasting denoising paths trapped in repetition with paths relatively free of repetition and subtracts it from the self-conditioning feedback during denoising. Using a direction estimated only once on ELF-B, ACE reduces mean 4-gram self-repetition rate from 7.28% to 4.48%, while retaining competitive results on several text-quality metrics beyond Gen-PPL. The direction remains effective across ELF sizes and inference configurations, and ACE also generalizes to other unconditional self-conditioned continuous diffusion language models. These results identify self-conditioning feedback as a source of repetition in continuous diffusion language models and show that ACE can directly mitigate this repetition during inference.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Discrete and text diffusion, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.

Builds on

24 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026ELF: Embedded Language Flows11 May
  2. 2026Continuous Latent Diffusion Language Model7 May
  3. 2026LangFlow: Continuous Diffusion Rivals Discrete in Language Modeling13 Apr
  4. 2026Generative Frontiers: Why Evaluation Matters for Diffusion Language Models3 Apr
  5. 2026CoDAR: Continuous Diffusion Language Models are More Powerful Than You Think3 Mar
  6. 2025Activation Steering for Masked Diffusion Language Models30 Dec
  7. 2025Continuous Diffusion Model for Language Modeling17 Feb
  8. 2023Likelihood-Based Diffusion Language Models30 May
  9. 2022Self-conditioned Embedding Diffusion for Text Generation8 Nov

Other references · 15

  1. 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  3. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  4. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  5. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  6. 2022Diffusion-LM Improves Controllable Text Generationcited by 1,027
  7. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
  8. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 503
  9. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
  10. 2022Analog Bits: Generating Discrete Data using Diffusion Models with Self-Conditioningcited by 373
  11. 2022A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text Generationcited by 225
  12. 2020Reformulating Unsupervised Style Transfer as Paraphrase Generationcited by 183
3 more
  1. 2022Learning to Break the Loop: Analyzing and Mitigating Repetitions for Neural Text Generationcited by 94
  2. 2025Insertion Language Models: Sequence Generation with Arbitrary-Position Insertionscited by 11
  3. 2026Hacking Generative Perplexity: Why Unconditional Text Evaluation Needs Distributional Metricscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Simple Diffusion Language Models Are More Effective Few-Step Generators Than Reported
  2. 2026On the Design Space of Continuous Diffusion Language Models
  3. 2026FastDiSS: Few-step Match Many-step Diffusion Language Model on Sequence-to-Sequence Generation--Full Version
  4. 2026Scaling Beyond Masked Diffusion Language Models
  5. 2025Breaking AR's Sampling Bottleneck: Provable Acceleration via Diffusion Language Models
  6. 2026DreamingGoose: Staged Distillation from Autoregressive Transformers to Bidirectional Recurrent Diffusion Language Models
  7. 2026DCR: Counterfactual Attractor Guidance for Rare Compositional Generation
  8. 2026LESS Is More: Mutual-Stability Sampling for Diffusion Language Models