mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TRIE: An Evaluation Framework for Stochastic PDE Surrogates

arXiv 2607.00196 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many scientific systems exhibit uncertainty from stochastic forcing, unresolved degrees of freedom, or imperfect observations, making reliable surrogate forecasting fundamentally distributional rather than pointwise. For such systems, deterministic neural surrogates fail to capture statistical measures and forecast uncertainty. We introduce TRIE, an evaluation framework for stochastic PDE surrogates that asks whether models reproduce invariant measures, provide trustworthy predictive uncertainty, and scale to efficient probabilistic generation. We demonstrate TRIE on two stationary chaotic spatially extended SPDEs, stochastic Kuramoto--Sivashinsky and stochastic Kolmogorov flow, across 11 parameter values. Our evaluation shows that standard pointwise-trained neural surrogates can produce plausible short rollouts while failing to match long-time statistical structure. Approximate uncertainty methods such as Monte Carlo dropout and heteroscedastic Gaussian likelihoods produce stochastic forecasts, but are often miscalibrated and overconfident under temporal and spatial uncertainty diagnostics. Across these criteria, generative models provide the most consistent performance, accurately capturing invariant measure statistics and achieving the lowest CRPS in all reported probabilistic settings. Finally, we show that latent generative models with automatic dimension discovery retain much of this statistical fidelity while reducing Kolmogorov inference time by roughly 12×. We release our code and data at https://github.com/scailab/TRIE-SPDE-Bench to support reproducible evaluation of stochastic PDE forecasting models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.

Builds on

23 of 42 references.

References · 23

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  4. 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 897
  5. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 779
  6. 2023PDE-Refiner: Achieving Accurate Long Rollouts with Neural PDE Solverscited by 205
  7. 2023GenCast: Diffusion-based ensemble forecasting for medium-range weathercited by 169
  8. 2023DYffusion: A Dynamics-informed Diffusion Model for Spatiotemporal Forecastingcited by 105
  9. 2023Stochastic interpolants with data-dependent couplingscited by 94
  10. 2022When Physics Meets Machine Learning: A Survey of Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 64
  11. 2024Probabilistic Forecasting with Stochastic Interpolants and F"ollmer Processescited by 61
  12. 2023DiffCast: A Unified Framework via Residual Diffusion for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 57
11 more
  1. 2022Stabilized Neural Ordinary Differential Equations for Long-Time Forecasting of Dynamical Systemscited by 50
  2. 2022Learning to correct spectral methods for simulating turbulent flowscited by 49
  3. 2021Neural Stochastic PDEs: Resolution-Invariant Learning of Continuous Spatiotemporal Dynamicscited by 46
  4. 2020Implicit Rank-Minimizing Autoencodercited by 35
  5. 2021Is MC Dropout Bayesian?cited by 35
  6. 2025PDE-Transformer: Efficient and Versatile Transformers for Physics Simulationscited by 29
  7. 2025Thermalizer: Stable autoregressive neural emulation of spatiotemporal chaoscited by 21
  8. 2025Lost in Latent Space: An Empirical Study of Latent Diffusion Models for Physics Emulationcited by 19
  9. 2023Autoencoders for discovering manifold dimension and coordinates in data from complex dynamical systemscited by 13
  10. 2023Nonlinear dimensionality reduction then and now: AIMs for dissipative PDEs in the ML eracited by 7
  11. 2025Unreliable Uncertainty Estimates with Monte Carlo Dropoutcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.