mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CogTax: A Four-Level Cognitive Taxonomy for Command-Line Computing Education

arXiv 2607.00140 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2026cs.CY cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As computing education expands beyond traditional programming into operational domains such as systems administration and command-line environments, existing pedagogical frameworks struggle to capture a dimension that is critical in these contexts: the real-world consequences of learner actions. Existing cognitive taxonomies classify learning objectives by mental operations but do not account for system impact, leaving a critical gap in command-line education where conceptually simple commands can have severe consequences. This work presents CogTax, a four-level cognitive taxonomy that integrates two dimensions: cognitive complexity, derived from Bloom's Revised Taxonomy, and operational impact, which distinguishes observational, reversible, structural, and administrative operations. The four progressive levels range from safe read-only inspection to advanced system management requiring integration of multiple abstract models. Then, the taxonomy level is defined as the maximum of these dimensions, ensuring that both conceptual understanding and operational awareness are addressed. CogTax gives instructors a principled framework for sequencing course material and calibrating assessment difficulty, and gives students an explicit reference for self-assessment and gap identification. To demonstrate that taxonomy levels are automatically assignable, making the framework scalable without manual expert annotation, a classifier that combines syntactic representations derived from abstract syntax trees with semantic embeddings is trained. Evaluated on 585 expert-annotated Linux/bash commands, this combined approach achieves 89% accuracy, outperforming either representation alone, and demonstrates cross-language extensibility through structural equivalences across command languages.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.

Builds on

12 of 36 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  2. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  3. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
  4. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 640
  5. 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 372
  6. 2022One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddingscited by 333
  7. 2023Problem-Solving Guide: Predicting the Algorithm Tags and Difficulty for Competitive Programming Problemscited by 5
  8. 2025Automated Analysis of Learning Outcomes and Exam Questions Based on Bloom's Taxonomycited by 4
  9. 2024Estimating Difficulty Levels of Programming Problems with Pre-trained Modelcited by 2
  10. 2025Smart Learning in the 21st Century: Advancing Constructionism Across Three Digital Epochscited by 2
  11. 2024Clustering MOOC Programming Solutions to Diversify Their Presentation to Studentscited by 1
  12. 2025Beyond SELECT: A Comprehensive Taxonomy-Guided Benchmark for Real-World Text-to-SQL Translationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.