mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Field Order Should Not Matter: Permutation-Invariant Embedding Model Fine-Tuning for Structured Metadata Retrieval

arXiv 2606.30473 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study retrieval over catalogs of structured metadata, where each record is a small schema whose fields answer different kinds of query. Embedding a record with a text encoder first serializes its fields into a string, which forces a choice of field order. We show this choice, usually treated as an implementation detail, silently controls retrieval quality once the encoder is fine-tuned. A standard fine-tune loses 7.4 nDCG@10 points when the index is rebuilt under a different field order, because it reads absolute position instead of the field labels. We propose permutation-invariant fine-tuning (PI-FT), which serializes each record under a freshly sampled field order with random field dropout, so meaning binds to the labels rather than to position. The change is about two lines in the data loader; it costs negligible in-distribution accuracy and cuts the order-change penalty to 0.2 points. We study this in the discovery of development statistics, a catalog of nearly 10,000 indicators that should be searchable in many languages by a model small enough to self-host. As AI assistants and agents increasingly mediate access to public data and statistics, this retrieval step decides whether an answer is grounded in the right indicator or series, making discoverability a precondition for disseminating data through AI. Because usage logs cannot provide training signal for indicators no one has searched, we generate the queries instead. DevDataBench is a fully LLM-generated benchmark of grounded, facet-targeted queries across 15 languages, covering every indicator for both training and evaluation. A fine-tuned 118M-parameter CPU encoder outperforms every zero-shot baseline, including texttttext-embedding-3-large (0.707 vs. 0.556 nDCG@10), with the largest gains in low-resource languages. We release the benchmark, pipeline, models, and a reusable PI-FT framework.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.

Builds on

39 of 55 references.

References · 39

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  6. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  7. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  8. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  9. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
  10. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
  11. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
  12. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
27 more
  1. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,253
  2. 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,252
  3. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
  4. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
  5. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
  6. 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 723
  7. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
  8. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 640
  9. 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 627
  10. 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 413
  11. 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 372
  12. 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 294
  13. 2022Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examplescited by 235
  14. 2019Document Expansion by Query Predictioncited by 231
  15. 2017Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Replycited by 229
  16. 2023Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languagescited by 214
  17. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 157
  18. 2023Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferencescited by 131
  19. 2021GPL: Generative Pseudo Labeling for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of Dense Retrievalcited by 119
  20. 2021mMARCO: A Multilingual Version of the MS MARCO Passage Ranking Datasetcited by 116
  21. 2018Janossy Pooling: Learning Deep Permutation-Invariant Functions for Variable-Size Inputscited by 98
  22. 2023REaLTabFormer: Generating Realistic Relational and Tabular Data using Transformerscited by 94
  23. 2022TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text Encodingcited by 91
  24. 2023Perspectives on Large Language Models for Relevance Judgmentcited by 85
  25. 2024GISTEmbed: Guided In-sample Selection of Training Negatives for Text Embedding Fine-tuningcited by 40
  26. 2019Dataset search: a surveycited by 36
  27. 2023Structure-Aware Language Model Pretraining Improves Dense Retrieval on Structured Datacited by 23

Built on by

Not cited yet.