Simplifying Flow Matching Transformations with Low-Rank Mixture Models
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
Normalizing flows are powerful generative models that learn an invertible mapping between complex data distributions and simple latent distributions, typically a standard normal density. However, this choice of latent density can impose unnecessary complexity on the learned flow transformation due to the topological mismatch between the latent and data densities, leading to slower training and suboptimal performance. In this work, we propose using mixtures of probabilistic principal component analyzers (MPPCA) as the latent density for normalizing flows. We simplify the learned flow transformation by learning a latent distribution that more closely aligns with the data distribution in terms of KL divergence, thus enabling faster convergence and improved generative performance. Critically, MPPCA models can be fit quickly and cheaply using the expectation-maximization algorithm, making them a practical choice for initializing latent distributions even in high-dimensional generative tasks. We validate our method on both tabular and image datasets, demonstrating consistent gains in training efficiency and generation quality compared to baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.
Builds on
24 of 32 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings28 Apr
- 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport1 Feb
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep
Other references · 20
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,761
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
- 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 684
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 596
- 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 594
- 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 377
8 more
- 2015MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution Estimationcited by 307
- 2020How to train your neural ODE: the world of Jacobian and kinetic regularizationcited by 228
- 2020OT-Flow: Fast and Accurate Continuous Normalizing Flows via Optimal Transportcited by 143
- 2022Action Matching: Learning Stochastic Dynamics from Samplescited by 98
- 2019Semi-Supervised Learning with Normalizing Flowscited by 76
- 2018On GANs and GMMscited by 62
- 2021Resampling Base Distributions of Normalizing Flowscited by 42
- 2020Stabilizing Invertible Neural Networks Using Mixture Modelscited by 30
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Efficient Flow Matching using Latent Variables
- 2023Flow Matching in Latent Space
- 2022VQ-Flows: Vector Quantized Local Normalizing Flows
- 2024Convergence Analysis of Flow Matching in Latent Space with Transformers
- 2024Normalizing Flows are Capable Generative Models
- 2026The Amazing Stability of Flow Matching
- 2026Generalization Bounds for Flow-matching Generative Models for Intrinsically Low-dimensional Data
- 2025On the Closed-Form of Flow Matching: Generalization Does Not Arise from Target Stochasticity