mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generalization Bounds for Flow-matching Generative Models for Intrinsically Low-dimensional Data

arXiv 2610.02663 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026stat.ML cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the remarkable empirical success of flow-matching models, their statistical generalization guarantees remain underdeveloped. Existing analyses often impose restrictive assumptions on the estimated velocity field and yield convergence rates that fail to reflect the intrinsic low-dimensional structure common in real data, such as natural images and molecular geometries. In this work, we study the statistical generalization of flow-matching models for learning an unknown distribution Pdata from finitely many samples. We derive finite-sample error bounds on the learned generative distribution, measured in the Wasserstein-p distance, for all p≥ 1. Specifically, given n i.i.d. samples from Pdata, we show that, for every d>dp^ast(Pdata) and appropriately chosen network architectures and hyperparameters, the learned distribution widehatPFM satisfies mathbbWp(widehatPFM,Pdata) lesssim n-1/d+n-1/(2p)bigl(log(1/xi)bigr)1/(2p) with probability at least 1-xi, where dp^ast(Pdata) denotes the Wasserstein-p dimension of the target measure. Our results demonstrate that flow matching naturally adapts to the intrinsic geometry of data and mitigates the curse of dimensionality, as the convergence exponent depends on the intrinsic rather than ambient dimension. These guarantees remain meaningful in high-dimensional regimes and provide a theoretical explanation for the empirical success of flow matching on structured data distributions under substantially more relaxed assumptions than those in existing analyses.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Generative Modeling with Continuous Flows: Sample Complexity of Flow Matching
  2. 2025On the Closed-Form of Flow Matching: Generalization Does Not Arise from Target Stochasticity
  3. 2025Carr'e du champ flow matching: better quality-generalisation tradeoff in generative models
  4. 2025A Theoretical Analysis of Discrete Flow Matching Generative Models
  5. 2025Distribution estimation via Flow Matching with Lipschitz guarantees
  6. 2024Flow matching achieves almost minimax optimal convergence
  7. 2025On the minimax optimality of Flow Matching through the connection to kernel density estimation
  8. 2024Convergence Analysis of Flow Matching in Latent Space with Transformers