Priced Motion Through Optimal Faces: A Normal-Fan Geometry for Non-Stationary Adversarial MDPs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In a changing decision problem, standard dynamic-regret analyses have often equated the cost of non-stationarity to how far loss moves. However, it is simultaneously possible for a loss sequence to travel far and retain the same optimal policy, or for a small movement in loss to force the optimal policy to change completely. Thus, the size of the movement through loss variation, transition variation, or comparator path length describe the adversary's motion, but not the cost of that motion to the control problem. For a more faithful analytic interpretation, this paper develops a normal-fan geometry for finite-horizon adversarial MDPs with fixed transitions. Occupancy measures form a polytope, and each loss vector exposes an optimal face of that polytope. Non-stationarity in rewards is therefore a path through the normal fan, where motion inside one cone leaves the optimal face unchanged, while crossing a wall may carry regret. We pose the notion of a face-crossing price, which is the minimum regret incurred by remaining on the previous optimal face under the new loss. For any learner that tracks the previous face, dynamic regret decomposes exactly into intrinsic priced face motion plus within-face selection error. The resulting theory separates consequential from harmless non-stationarity, where loss variation can be arbitrarily large at zero price, and identical one-coordinate variation can hide horizon-scale differences in regret.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2026.
Builds on
24 of 46 references.
References · 24
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2013Non-stationary Stochastic Optimizationcited by 173
- 2021Policy Mirror Descent for Reinforcement Learning: Linear Convergence, New Sampling Complexity, and Generalized Problem Classescited by 149
- 2015Online Optimization : Competing with Dynamic Comparatorscited by 99
- 2021Non-stationary Reinforcement Learning without Prior Knowledge: An Optimal Black-box Approachcited by 98
- 2020Dynamic Regret of Convex and Smooth Functionscited by 90
- 2021Policy Mirror Descent for Regularized Reinforcement Learning: A Generalized Framework with Linear Convergencecited by 83
- 2019Online Convex Optimization in Adversarial Markov Decision Processescited by 79
- 2020Reinforcement Learning for Non-Stationary Markov Decision Processes: The Blessing of (More) Optimismcited by 75
- 2021Adaptivity and Non-stationarity: Problem-dependent Dynamic Regret for Online Convex Optimizationcited by 66
- 2013Dynamical Models and Tracking Regret in Online Convex Programmingcited by 42
- 2020Dynamic Regret of Policy Optimization in Non-stationary Environmentscited by 32
12 more
- 2019The Value Function Polytope in Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2023A Novel Framework for Policy Mirror Descent with General Parameterization and Linear Convergencecited by 29
- 2023Identifiability and Generalizability in Constrained Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2020Model-Free Non-Stationary RL: Near-Optimal Regret and Applications in Multi-Agent RL and Inventory Controlcited by 15
- 2022Dynamic Regret of Online Markov Decision Processescited by 13
- 2022Geometry and convergence of natural policy gradient methodscited by 12
- 2021Learning User Preferences in Non-Stationary Environmentscited by 10
- 2019Large Scale Markov Decision Processes with Changing Rewardscited by 7
- 2024Improved Algorithm for Adversarial Linear Mixture MDPs with Bandit Feedback and Unknown Transitioncited by 6
- 2024Near-Optimal Dynamic Regret for Adversarial Linear Mixture MDPscited by 5
- 2022Dynamic Regret of Online Mirror Descent for Relatively Smooth Convex Cost Functionscited by 2
- 2025On the Effect of Regularization in Policy Mirror Descentcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.