mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PAC-Bayesian Certificates for Quadratic Closed-Loop Control

arXiv 2606.28281 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2026eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

PAC-Bayesian bounds provide finite-sample guarantees for data-dependent randomized predictors, but applying them to learning-based control is difficult because the natural objective is a quadratic trajectory cost. Such losses are unbounded, non-Lipschitz , and lead to response-dependent Chernoff terms. We employ System Level Synthesis parameterization, which exposes the closed-loop trajectory map of a linear system directly and makes the quadratic control loss amenable to explicit certification. Moreover, we provide a set of PAC-Bayes-Chernoff certificates for posterior distributions over feasible closed-loop responses. For Gaussian disturbance trajectories with arbitrary covariance, we derive an exact one-sided Gaussian transform and a tractable quadratic upper bound expressed through closed-loop sensitivity quantities. We also derive a posterior-localized surrogate for settings where pointwise closed-loop response certificates are unavailable or have support related admissibility issues. Although PAC-Bayes certifies a non-degenerate posterior, the convex quadratic form of the SLS loss transfers the certificate to the posterior mean response. We present a deterministic mean response deployment result that is particularly suitable for control while retaining the stochastic posterior in the bound. Additionally, we provide a data-driven bound for this deployment, transitioning away from an oracle bound. Minimizing this bound naturally results in a learning algorithm for control selection from data. Numerical experiments on a double integrator show that the algorithm acts as a sensitivity-aware finite-sample regularizer, improving held-out cost and reducing closed-loop sensitivity in the low-data regime

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.

Builds on

18 of 44 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 533
  2. 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 239
  3. 2018A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Controlcited by 151
  4. 2019A Primer on PAC-Bayesian Learningcited by 132
  5. 2020Tighter risk certificates for neural networkscited by 112
  6. 2024Theoretical Foundations of Conformal Predictioncited by 101
  7. 2016PAC-Bayesian Theory Meets Bayesian Inferencecited by 88
  8. 2024Formal Verification and Control with Conformal Predictioncited by 26
  9. 2018PAC-Bayes Control: Learning Policies that Provably Generalize to Novel Environmentscited by 22
  10. 2021Bridging direct & indirect data-driven control formulations via regularizations and relaxationscited by 11
  11. 2016A System Level Approach to Controller Synthesiscited by 9
  12. 2024PAC-Bayes-Chernoff bounds for unbounded lossescited by 9
6 more
  1. 2024A PAC-Bayesian Framework for Optimal Control with Stability Guaranteescited by 7
  2. 2024Conformal Prediction for Distribution-free Optimal Control of Linear Stochastic Systemscited by 5
  3. 2021A System Level Approach to Tube-based Model Predictive Controlcited by 4
  4. 2025PAC-Bayesian Optimal Control with Stability and Generalization Guaranteescited by 2
  5. 2025System Level Synthesis for Affine Control Policies: Model Based and Data-Driven Settingscited by 1
  6. 2026Distributionally Robust PAC-Bayesian Controlcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.