Adaptive Utility driven Resource Orchestration for Resilient AI (AURORA-AI)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern AI systems are increasingly deployed under non-stationary computational, demographic, and operational conditions in which static resource allocation strategies degrade both predictive performance and human-centric properties such as fairness and explainability. This paper presents AURORA-AI, an Adaptive Utility-driven Resource Orchestration framework for Resilient AI that unifies Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman feedback control, Lyapunov-based stability monitoring, and a fairness-aware composite utility into a single closed-loop policy.The framework continuously redistributes computational budget across a population of heterogeneous AI models so that the global utility, defined jointly over predictive performance, demographic parity, cost, latency, robustness, and interpretability, remains maximised under disruption. The framework is evaluated in a stress-rich discrete-time simulation that concurrently injects demographic bias shocks, gradual concept drift, and abrupt black-swan disruptions, and is compared against five established controllers including Static, Round Robin, Greedy, LinUCB, and a deep reinforcement-learning agent based on Proximal Policy Optimisation. AURORA-AI achieves immediate recovery from the black-swan event compared to eighty-eight time steps for the Static baseline and twenty-two for Proximal Policy Optimisation, lifts the alpha-quantile and the super-quantile by twenty-nine and twenty-five percent respectively, simultaneously reduces the mean and maximum demographic parity gap, and increases the fraction of Lyapunov-stable operating steps. These results indicate that fairness-aware adaptive orchestration grounded in stability theory is a practical and theoretically motivated path toward resilient human-centric AI deployment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.
Builds on
7 of 12 references.
References · 7
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
- 2023Getting from Generative AI to Trustworthy AI: What LLMs might learn from Cyccited by 19
- 2022Toward Safe and Accelerated Deep Reinforcement Learning for Next-Generation Wireless Networkscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.