Structure Before Collapse: Transient semantic geometry in next-token prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural Collapse predicts that balanced one-hot classification pushes model representations to be equally far from each other; a symmetric configuration that depends only on the output label and ignores any semantic similarity in the inputs. This creates a puzzle: next-token prediction language models are trained predominantly (as context length increases) with one-hot labels: the same context is very unlikely to appear twice in training with different labels. However, they clearly learn latent structural features. That is, despite the one-hot training regime, a language model's contextual embeddings represent the fact that the next word in ''Mary broke the ___'' is likely to be filled by tokens in the latent classes of a) medium-sized, b) rigid, c) inanimate nouns. How does gradient descent find such categorical semantic structure when co-occurrence statistics collapse to one-hot sparsity, eliminating any shared next-tokens among different contexts? To investigate this tension we identify three synthetic controlled settings where inputs have latent semantic factors but are mapped to distinct one-hot labels. We find that semantic geometry emerges early in training, and that representations cluster by shared attributes despite receiving no explicit supervision to do so. This structure is transient: with sufficient capacity and time, the model eventually reaches the predicted symmetric state where all representations are equally separated. We study this phase transition through Gram matrix analysis and propose a preliminary modification to the commonly used unconstrained features model to capture the emergent semantic geometry.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.
Builds on
62 of 84 references.
References · 62
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
- 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 417
- 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 313
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
38 more
- 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 264
- 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 226
- 2019Visualizing and Measuring the Geometry of BERTcited by 215
- 2021Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Modelscited by 179
- 2021Exploring Deep Neural Networks via Layer-Peeled Model: Minority Collapse in Imbalanced Trainingcited by 166
- 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 151
- 2020Neural collapse with unconstrained featurescited by 140
- 2023Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMscited by 121
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 1, Learning Hierarchical Language Structurescited by 83
- 2022Imbalance Trouble: Revisiting Neural-Collapse Geometrycited by 80
- 2024On the Origins of Linear Representations in Large Language Modelscited by 76
- 2024Transformers represent belief state geometry in their residual streamcited by 73
- 2020Does syntax need to grow on trees? Sources of hierarchical inductive bias in sequence-to-sequence networkscited by 72
- 2024The Semantic Hub Hypothesis: Language Models Share Semantic Representations Across Languages and Modalitiescited by 69
- 2024Language Models Learn Rare Phenomena from Less Rare Phenomena: The Case of the Missing AANNscited by 65
- 2018Norm matters: efficient and accurate normalization schemes in deep networkscited by 62
- 2022Characterizing Intrinsic Compositionality in Transformers with Tree Projectionscited by 40
- 2024AI as Humanity's Salieri: Quantifying Linguistic Creativity of Language Models via Systematic Attribution of Machine Text against Web Textcited by 40
- 2023Generalized Neural Collapse for a Large Number of Classescited by 39
- 2025On the generalization of language models from in-context learning and finetuning: a controlled studycited by 39
- 2024Towards a theory of how the structure of language is acquired by deep neural networkscited by 38
- 2024Linguistic Collapse: Neural Collapse in (Large) Language Modelscited by 36
- 2025Between Circuits and Chomsky: Pre-pretraining on Formal Languages Imparts Linguistic Biasescited by 36
- 2024Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models can Generalize from Indirect Evidencecited by 35
- 2023Injecting structural hints: Using language models to study inductive biases in language learningcited by 33
- 2025How do language models learn facts? Dynamics, curricula and hallucinationscited by 33
- 2025Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-trainingcited by 33
- 2024Mission: Impossible Language Modelscited by 31
- 2024Learning Syntax Without Planting Trees: Understanding Hierarchical Generalization in Transformerscited by 24
- 2024Implicit Geometry of Next-token Prediction: From Language Sparsity Patterns to Model Representationscited by 24
- 2023On the Implicit Geometry of Cross-Entropy Parameterizations for Label-Imbalanced Datacited by 23
- 2026Symmetry in language statistics shapes the geometry of model representationscited by 20
- 2021Transformers Generalize Linearlycited by 19
- 2025Data Mixing Can Induce Phase Transitions in Knowledge Acquisitioncited by 15
- 2026Training Language Models via Neural Cellular Automatacited by 15
- 2024Implicit Optimization Bias of Next-Token Prediction in Linear Modelscited by 14
- 2024Wide Neural Networks Trained with Weight Decay Provably Exhibit Neural Collapsecited by 14
- 2024The Persistence of Neural Collapse Despite Low-Rank Biascited by 12
50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.