mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Structure Before Collapse: Transient semantic geometry in next-token prediction

arXiv 2606.26749 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural Collapse predicts that balanced one-hot classification pushes model representations to be equally far from each other; a symmetric configuration that depends only on the output label and ignores any semantic similarity in the inputs. This creates a puzzle: next-token prediction language models are trained predominantly (as context length increases) with one-hot labels: the same context is very unlikely to appear twice in training with different labels. However, they clearly learn latent structural features. That is, despite the one-hot training regime, a language model's contextual embeddings represent the fact that the next word in ''Mary broke the ___'' is likely to be filled by tokens in the latent classes of a) medium-sized, b) rigid, c) inanimate nouns. How does gradient descent find such categorical semantic structure when co-occurrence statistics collapse to one-hot sparsity, eliminating any shared next-tokens among different contexts? To investigate this tension we identify three synthetic controlled settings where inputs have latent semantic factors but are mapped to distinct one-hot labels. We find that semantic geometry emerges early in training, and that representations cluster by shared attributes despite receiving no explicit supervision to do so. This structure is transient: with sufficient capacity and time, the model eventually reaches the predicted symmetric state where all representations are equally separated. We study this phase transition through Gram matrix analysis and propose a preliminary modification to the commonly used unconstrained features model to capture the emergent semantic geometry.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

Builds on

62 of 84 references.

References · 62

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  3. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  4. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
  5. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  6. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
  7. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
  8. 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
  9. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  10. 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 417
  11. 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 313
  12. 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
38 more
  1. 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 264
  2. 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 226
  3. 2019Visualizing and Measuring the Geometry of BERTcited by 215
  4. 2021Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Modelscited by 179
  5. 2021Exploring Deep Neural Networks via Layer-Peeled Model: Minority Collapse in Imbalanced Trainingcited by 166
  6. 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 151
  7. 2020Neural collapse with unconstrained featurescited by 140
  8. 2023Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMscited by 121
  9. 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 1, Learning Hierarchical Language Structurescited by 83
  10. 2022Imbalance Trouble: Revisiting Neural-Collapse Geometrycited by 80
  11. 2024On the Origins of Linear Representations in Large Language Modelscited by 76
  12. 2024Transformers represent belief state geometry in their residual streamcited by 73
  13. 2020Does syntax need to grow on trees? Sources of hierarchical inductive bias in sequence-to-sequence networkscited by 72
  14. 2024The Semantic Hub Hypothesis: Language Models Share Semantic Representations Across Languages and Modalitiescited by 69
  15. 2024Language Models Learn Rare Phenomena from Less Rare Phenomena: The Case of the Missing AANNscited by 65
  16. 2018Norm matters: efficient and accurate normalization schemes in deep networkscited by 62
  17. 2022Characterizing Intrinsic Compositionality in Transformers with Tree Projectionscited by 40
  18. 2024AI as Humanity's Salieri: Quantifying Linguistic Creativity of Language Models via Systematic Attribution of Machine Text against Web Textcited by 40
  19. 2023Generalized Neural Collapse for a Large Number of Classescited by 39
  20. 2025On the generalization of language models from in-context learning and finetuning: a controlled studycited by 39
  21. 2024Towards a theory of how the structure of language is acquired by deep neural networkscited by 38
  22. 2024Linguistic Collapse: Neural Collapse in (Large) Language Modelscited by 36
  23. 2025Between Circuits and Chomsky: Pre-pretraining on Formal Languages Imparts Linguistic Biasescited by 36
  24. 2024Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models can Generalize from Indirect Evidencecited by 35
  25. 2023Injecting structural hints: Using language models to study inductive biases in language learningcited by 33
  26. 2025How do language models learn facts? Dynamics, curricula and hallucinationscited by 33
  27. 2025Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-trainingcited by 33
  28. 2024Mission: Impossible Language Modelscited by 31
  29. 2024Learning Syntax Without Planting Trees: Understanding Hierarchical Generalization in Transformerscited by 24
  30. 2024Implicit Geometry of Next-token Prediction: From Language Sparsity Patterns to Model Representationscited by 24
  31. 2023On the Implicit Geometry of Cross-Entropy Parameterizations for Label-Imbalanced Datacited by 23
  32. 2026Symmetry in language statistics shapes the geometry of model representationscited by 20
  33. 2021Transformers Generalize Linearlycited by 19
  34. 2025Data Mixing Can Induce Phase Transitions in Knowledge Acquisitioncited by 15
  35. 2026Training Language Models via Neural Cellular Automatacited by 15
  36. 2024Implicit Optimization Bias of Next-Token Prediction in Linear Modelscited by 14
  37. 2024Wide Neural Networks Trained with Weight Decay Provably Exhibit Neural Collapsecited by 14
  38. 2024The Persistence of Neural Collapse Despite Low-Rank Biascited by 12

50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.