mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Multi-Level Validation and Traceability Framework for AI-Generated Telescope Scheduling Decisions

arXiv 2606.26585 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2026cs.AI astro-ph.IMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the gradual introduction of AI into telescope scheduling, AI-based decision-making has shown advantages in handling complex multi-constraint problems. However, its outputs often suffer from inconsistent data references, reasoning errors, and non-executable decisions, limiting applicability in high-reliability observational tasks. In this work, we propose a multi-level validation and traceable reasoning framework that performs systematic reliability verification of AI-generated decisions prior to execution, and enables explicit representation of the reasoning process to support traceable decision-making. The framework integrates data reference validation, logical consistency checks, and observational and instrumental constraint verification to filter and correct invalid decisions. It also introduces atomic reasoning units and their dependency relationships, representing scheduling decisions as a sequence of interconnected reasoning steps that support error localization and post hoc analysis. Experiments show that the framework improves executability and reliability of AI scheduling and reduces loss of transient opportunities. In particular, feedback correction and structured validation of reasoning steps enhance the ability to repair and block erroneous decisions, especially in complex scenarios. Compared with pure AI methods, the framework-enhanced approach maintains flexibility while substantially improving reliability and executability. These results demonstrate a feasible and verifiable pathway for applying AI to high-reliability astronomical observation scheduling.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

Builds on

4 of 23 references.

References · 4

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
  3. 2024StarWhisper Telescope: An AI framework for automating end-to-end astronomical observationscited by 4
  4. 2015An Integer Linear Programming Solution to the Telescope Network Scheduling Problemcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025AstroReview: An LLM-driven Multi-Agent Framework for Telescope Proposal Peer Review and Refinement
  2. 2026Plausible but Wrong: A case study on Agentic Failures in Astrophysical Workflows
  3. 2025Solving Online Resource-Constrained Scheduling for Follow-Up Observation in Astronomy: a Reinforcement Learning Approach
  4. 2026AstroMind: A High-Fidelity Benchmark for Spacecraft Behavior Reasoning Based on Large Language Models
  5. 2026Glass Box at Orbit: A Constitutional AI Verification Framework for Trustworthy Autonomous CubeSat Intelligence
  6. 2026AstroVLM: Expert Multi-agent Collaborative Reasoning for Astronomical Imaging Quality Diagnosis
  7. 2026Argus: A General-Purpose Agentic Reasoning Runtime for Long-Horizon Tasks
  8. 2025Reasoning With a Star: A Heliophysics Dataset and Benchmark for Agentic Scientific Reasoning