mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Low-Complexity Policy Tessellations in Structured Markov Decision Processes

arXiv 2606.25593 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

We study optimal-policy geometry in structured Markov decision processes. While approximate dynamic programming and reinforcement learning typically approximate high-dimensional value functions, we show that optimal policies induce simpler decision tessellations. We propose boundary-based policy approximations that learn policy regions directly. A policy-loss decomposition links performance degradation to action margins and explains why errors concentrate near indifference boundaries. Inventory control and queue admission experiments show lower policy error, smaller value gaps, faster error decay, and stability than reinforcement learning baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 0 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.

Builds on

0 of 8 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Addressing Finite-Horizon MDPs via Low-Rank Tensor Value Approximation
  2. 2021Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2025Realizable Abstractions: Near-Optimal Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026Mathematical methods of reinforcement learning
  5. 2026Performance-Driven Environment Abstraction with Multi-Timescale Learning
  6. 2024Landscape of Policy Optimization for Finite Horizon MDPs with General State and Action
  7. 2026Towards Optimal Policy Improvement
  8. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Continuous Actions Under Unmeasured Confounding