mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatic Generation of Highlights for Academic Paper Via Prompt-based Learning

arXiv 2606.25253 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.DL cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Highlights provide a concise summary of the main contributions of an academic paper and help readers quickly understand its focus. However, many journals do not provide highlights, which limits their use in literature retrieval, text mining, and bibliometric analysis. Existing studies have explored supervised learning methods for automatic highlight extraction, but these methods usually require large amounts of labeled training data. This study investigates prompt-based learning for automatic highlight generation. We design task-specific prompt templates and combine them with paper abstracts as model inputs. Several language models are evaluated, including locally deployed pre-trained models such as GPT-2 and T5, as well as ChatGPT accessed through an API. Experiments on three datasets show that ChatGPT with prompt templates achieves performance comparable to previous supervised methods without using task-specific training samples. When a small number of examples are added to the prompts, the model significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods on two datasets. We further analyze how prompt design affects generation quality and find that, although ChatGPT has strong language modeling ability, its performance on this task is highly sensitive to the information provided in the prompt. Case studies also show that the generated highlights are generally coherent, informative, and close to author-written highlights. This study is among the first to apply prompt-based learning to academic highlight generation. The proposed method does not rely on domain-specific training corpora and can generate highlights for papers that lack such information, thereby supporting downstream text mining and bibliometric research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.

Builds on

19 of 43 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  6. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  8. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  9. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  10. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  11. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
  12. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 938
7 more
  1. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 716
  2. 2021PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classificationcited by 238
  3. 2021OpenPrompt: An Open-source Framework for Prompt-learningcited by 148
  4. 2017A Supervised Approach to Extractive Summarisation of Scientific Paperscited by 33
  5. 2022QaNER: Prompting Question Answering Models for Few-shot Named Entity Recognitioncited by 15
  6. 2023PromptRank: Unsupervised Keyphrase Extraction Using Promptcited by 13
  7. 2023Generation of Highlights from Research Papers Using Pointer-Generator Networks and SciBERT Embeddingscited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.