mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adapt Only When It Pays: Budgeted Decision-Loss Priority for Delayed Online Time-Series Adaptation

arXiv 2606.25068 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Online time-series forecasters receive labels only after horizon-dependent delays, while every adaptation step spends limited compute. We study when an online learner should update, not how to adapt at every opportunity, and introduce ADOWIP: a residual-adapter framework with sealed delay queues, exact budget accounting, and auditable update telemetry. Its main scheduler is an observed decision-loss priority gate that updates only after feedback is revealed, when downstream loss, optionally penalized by prediction MSE, exceeds a calibrated empirical quantile and budget remains. We prove hard-budget feasibility, projected-OGD regret for a convex linear accepted-update subproblem, and stability plus conditional finite-sample gate-selection statements. On public ETT capacity-planning tasks, a frozen calibration/evaluation split selects a gate that lowers held-out decision loss against always, fixed-period, and drift-triggered exact-update baselines under matched compute. Secondary threshold/load-index ETT suites are mixed: 33 of 41 selected contrasts clear the stricter cross-artifact Holm family, and the 8 nonpassing rows are explicitly excluded from primary claims. The same protocol improves an external UCI Bike capacity proxy with 20/0 held-out wins, and a fixed gate passes three full-year Capital Bikeshare station-rebalancing contrasts. Probe-based and finance experiments remain negative, delimiting the current scope of decision-prioritized adaptation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.

Builds on

4 of 6 references.

References · 4

  1. 2026The Forecast After the Forecast: A Post-Processing Shift in Time Seriescited by 10
  2. 2025Online time series prediction using feature adjustmentcited by 4
  3. 2025Calibrating Decision Robustness via Inverse Conformal Risk Controlcited by 4
  4. 2025Tackling Time-Series Forecasting Generalization via Mitigating Concept Driftcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.