A Step Towards Inherently Interpretable Causal Machine Learning Models For Decision Support
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The growing reliance on machine learning for decisions across sectors underscores the importance of model transparency and interpretability. Existing post hoc explainability methods and inherently interpretable approaches shed light on model behavior, yet they primarily reveal how models exploit correlations to maximize performance in prediction tasks. However, many decisions require causal insights and the possibility of using models for what-if scenario evaluation. To address this, we propose the integration of causal machine learning with inherently interpretable models for cross-sectional data. We evaluate these methods in terms of predictive accuracy and interpretability. Our findings show that the proposed approach achieves competitive performance in prediction and what-if analysis while offering transparency on the system structure, causal relationships among variables, and the functional forms that connect them. This work contributes to research on causality, machine learning interpretability, and data-driven decision support by offering informed, transparent, and causally grounded decisions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.
Builds on
23 of 55 references.
References · 23
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
- 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 475
- 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 225
- 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
- 2022Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problemscited by 107
- 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
- 2022Deep End-to-end Causal Inferencecited by 93
11 more
- 2020DoWhy: An End-to-End Library for Causal Inferencecited by 92
- 2020Interpretability of machine learning based prediction models in healthcarecited by 75
- 2020General Pitfalls of Model-Agnostic Interpretation Methods for Machine Learning Modelscited by 74
- 2024Causal machine learning for predicting treatment outcomescited by 73
- 2022Forecast Evaluation for Data Scientists: Common Pitfalls and Best Practicescited by 54
- 2022DoWhy-GCM: An extension of DoWhy for causal inference in graphical causal modelscited by 40
- 2023A Survey on Causal Discovery Methods for I.I.D. and Time Series Datacited by 35
- 2023A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare: Why, How, and When?cited by 24
- 2023Self-Compatibility: Evaluating Causal Discovery without Ground Truthcited by 22
- 2023The role of causality in explainable artificial intelligencecited by 17
- 2023Toward Falsifying Causal Graphs Using a Permutation-Based Testcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.