mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GeoRouteNet: A Geometry-Aware Non-Autoregressive Neural Solver for the Euclidean Traveling Salesman Problem

arXiv 2606.22776 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Non-autoregressive neural solvers amortize computation across traveling salesman problem (TSP) instances, but models trained on random Euclidean instances can degrade when the number or spatial distribution of nodes changes. We study whether explicit geometric features and a richer within-instance training signal improve transfer across graph sizes and spatial distributions. We introduce GeoRouteNet, which augments a non-autoregressive TSP solver with centered node offsets and radii, learnable radial distance bases, distance-aware graph attention, explicit edge messages, and cross-layer representation mixing. We also introduce multi-candidate self-comparison reinforcement learning (MCS-RL), which trains on several sampled tours per instance using a leave-one-out adaptive baseline, winner-candidate guidance, and annealed entropy regularization. In a single-seed study, all neural variants are trained only on random TSP-50 instances and evaluated with the same greedy and beam-search decoders. Under Beam-1000 decoding, GeoRouteNet-MCS-RL obtains gaps of 0.32% on the TSP-50 validation set used for checkpoint selection, 1.26% on a correlated TSP-100 size diagnostic, and 3.60% across 27 TSPLIB EUC_2D instances. The NAR4TSP-PG gaps on the same evaluations are 0.42%, 2.73%, and 17.12%. A 2x2 comparison crosses encoder and training choices. Under PG, the geometry-aware encoder has lower gaps than the reproduced encoder on the TSP-100 diagnostic and TSPLIB. With the geometry-aware encoder, MCS-RL is associated with a further reduction; with the reproduced encoder, it has a higher TSPLIB gap.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.

Builds on

18 of 29 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  4. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
  5. 2015Pointer Networkscited by 895
  6. 2018Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!cited by 656
  7. 2016Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 608
  8. 2020POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learningcited by 348
  9. 2018Reinforcement Learning for Solving the Vehicle Routing Problemcited by 333
  10. 2019An Efficient Graph Convolutional Network Technique for the Travelling Salesman Problemcited by 269
  11. 2023DIFUSCO: Graph-based Diffusion Solvers for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 221
  12. 2022DIMES: A Differentiable Meta Solver for Combinatorial Optimization Problemscited by 129
6 more
  1. 2022Sym-NCO: Leveraging Symmetricity for Neural Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 119
  2. 2019Neural Large Neighborhood Search for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problemcited by 117
  3. 2021Learning to Iteratively Solve Routing Problems with Dual-Aspect Collaborative Transformercited by 108
  4. 2020Learning the Travelling Salesperson Problem Requires Rethinking Generalizationcited by 98
  5. 2025An Efficient Diffusion-based Non-Autoregressive Solver for Traveling Salesman Problemcited by 9
  6. 2025LocalEscaper: A Weakly-supervised Framework with Regional Reconstruction for Scalable Neural TSP Solverscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Geometric Self-Supervised Pre-training for Neural Combinatorial Optimization
  2. 2026Leveraging Structural Constraints for Diffusion-based Neural TSP Solvers
  3. 2025A Unified Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Close Enough Traveling Salesman Problem
  4. 2026GeoPAR: Large-Scale Multi-Agent Combinatorial Optimization with Geometry-Guided Parallel Autoregressive Learning
  5. 2025Mechanistic Interpretability for Neural TSP Solvers
  6. 2025Diversity Optimization for Travelling Salesman Problem via Deep Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026Offline Decision Transformers for Neural Combinatorial Optimization: Surpassing Heuristics on the Traveling Salesman Problem
  8. 2025Generative Modeling for Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning on the Traveling Salesman Problem