Skin-Deep: A Geometric Diagnostic for Alignment Fragility in Large Language Model Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Refusal on a safety benchmark does not reveal how stable that behavior will remain after model updates. Benign downstream fine-tuning can weaken refusal, yet behavioral evaluations typically expose this fragility only after an intervention. We introduce SKIN-DEEP, a geometric diagnostic that examines the unmodified model's residual-stream activations. It compares aligned and base checkpoints to identify safety-separating directions, tests their behavioral relevance through ablation, and summarizes the layer-wise pattern in the Geometric Fragility Score (GFS). Across twenty-one instruction-tuned models, harmful requests and benign instructions exhibit a recurring low-rank separation pattern. Selected direction ablations weaken refusal, with the effective direction varying across models. In benign low-rank fine-tuning experiments, the initially safe model with the lowest score before fine-tuning has the lowest harmful-compliance rate when trained on the largest tested set of harmless examples. These findings connect representation geometry to subsequent behavioral susceptibility and support activation-based diagnostics as a complement to refusal tests. Our code is available at https://github.com/js-lee-AI/skin-deep.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.
Builds on
23 of 55 references.
References · 23
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
11 more
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
- 2023Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Modelscited by 297
- 2023OpenChat: Advancing Open-source Language Models with Mixed-Quality Datacited by 252
- 2024Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modificationscited by 231
- 2023LoRA Fine-tuning Efficiently Undoes Safety Training in Llama 2-Chat 70Bcited by 195
- 2024A Mechanistic Understanding of Alignment Algorithms: A Case Study on DPO and Toxicitycited by 185
- 2022There is no rose without a thorn: Finding weaknesses on BlenderBot 2.0 in terms of Model, Data and User-Centric Approachcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs
- 2026Refusal geometry reflects refusal training: diverse refusal prefixes can raise stable rank and weaken refusal vector ablation attacks
- 2026When Safety Routing Breaks: Understanding Alignment Fragility under Benign Fine-Tuning
- 2026The Geometry of Refusal: Linear Instability in Safety-Aligned LLMs
- 2026Over-Refusal and Representation Subspaces: A Mechanistic Analysis of Task-Conditioned Refusal in Aligned LLMs
- 2026Harnessing Textual Refusal Directions for Multimodal Safety
- 2026From Refusal Geometry to Safety Geometry: Harmfulness--Refusal Coupling under Dynamic Adversarial Fine-Tuning
- 2026The Geometry of Alignment Collapse: When Fine-Tuning Breaks Safety