mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

All Routes Lead to Collapse

arXiv 2606.22325 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Attention sinks, representation collapse, and norm stratification are treated as transformer-specific pathologies. We show they are not specific to attention: they are what content-based routing does under a fixed similarity metric. We give a reframing identity: softmax attention is Boltzmann-weighted aggregation over Euclidean distances with constant key norms, so its score omits a -|k|2 term and is blind to key magnitude. This predicts that any router whose metric is ill-matched to its representations should compensate, by concentrating its routing and collapsing the routed representations. We test it on routers that score and aggregate over different axes: softmax attention over tokens (nine pretrained transformers), graph attention over nodes, a selective state-space model and a recurrent mixer over time, and learned residuals over depth. All develop the same signature, and two within-model ablations show it is caused by the routing mechanism rather than by incidental dynamics. The form is contingent, set by the strength of the positional brake each router carries alongside its content score; we sweep that brake and move the onset across its whole range. The mechanism is not contingent, and it does not require norm stratification: a router with norm-normalized keys concentrates just the same. We do not claim these models implement Riemannian geometry; the geometric view is a diagnostic that names the inadequacy of the flat, norm-blind metric.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.

Builds on

15 of 18 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  4. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  5. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  6. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
  7. 2021Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolationcited by 1,103
  8. 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,102
  9. 2023RWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Eracited by 827
  10. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
  11. 2021Attention is Not All You Need: Pure Attention Loses Rank Doubly Exponentially with Depthcited by 419
  12. 2024The Hidden Attention of Mamba Modelscited by 91
3 more
  1. 2026Attention Residualscited by 65
  2. 2026Memory Caching: RNNs with Growing Memorycited by 15
  3. 2026Do Transformers Need Three Projections? Systematic Study of QKV Variantscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026When Does Content-Based Routing Work? Representation Requirements for Selective Attention in Hybrid Sequence Models
  2. 2026Evidence for Shared Routing Geometry and Dynamics in Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
  3. 2026Routing Absorption in Sparse Attention: Why Random Gates Are Hard to Beat
  4. 2026Attention-Aware Routing: Coupling Routing and Attention in MoEs
  5. 2025On the Existence and Behavior of Secondary Attention Sinks
  6. 2026The Diffusion-Attention Connection
  7. 2026Attention Sinks in Diffusion Transformers: A Causal Analysis
  8. 2026Beyond the Previous Layer: Residual Predictive Structure in Sparse MoE Routing