mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Spectrally Safe Neural Operator Warm-Starts for Large-Scale Newton Solvers

arXiv 2606.21828 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2026math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural operators are increasingly used to warm-start Newton solvers for nonlinear PDEs, on the premise that a low test error places the initial guess inside the basin of attraction. We show that this premise is unreliable. An operator trained to the relative (L2) error (O(10-3)) can still produce an initial state in which the discrete Jacobian is indefinite, because the mean-squared training controls error on average while leaving localized pointwise violations of the underlying physics. For a nearly incompressible hyperelasticity problem, we trace this to the predicted volume change: the operator disperses (det F) well away from one, and the resulting Jacobian acquires negative eigenvalues even when the predicted field is visually indistinguishable from the reference. At a small scale, this is a nuisance; at a multi-million degree-of-freedom scale, it is disqualifying, since the conjugate gradient and other Krylov solvers needed for memory-feasible Newton steps assume a definite spectrum. We then show that a short, label-free fine-tuning phase -- penalizing the operator against the discrete energy, with no additional solution data -- shifts the Jacobian spectrum back to positive definite. Combined with an inexact outer loop, this gives a warm-started Newton method that converges across the full loading range where the unregularized operator fails, reaching up to 5.4(×) wall-clock speedup over incremental continuation on a 3D problem with 6.4 million degrees of freedom.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 46 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  4. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  5. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  6. 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 299
  7. 2023Spherical Fourier Neural Operators: Learning Stable Dynamics on the Spherecited by 225
  8. 2022Multifidelity deep neural operators for efficient learning of partial differential equations with application to fast inverse design of nanoscale heat transportcited by 92
  9. 2025Transolver++: An Accurate Neural Solver for PDEs on Million-Scale Geometriescited by 89
  10. 2022Blending Neural Operators and Relaxation Methods in PDE Numerical Solverscited by 53
  11. 2023On the training and generalization of deep operator networkscited by 31
  12. 2023Elliptic PDE learning is provably data-efficientcited by 26
8 more
  1. 2023Finite Element Operator Network for Solving Elliptic-type parametric PDEscited by 14
  2. 2023Spectral operator learning for parametric PDEs without data reliancecited by 9
  3. 2025NOWS: Neural Operator Warm Starts for Accelerating Iterative Solverscited by 9
  4. 2024A Pretraining-Finetuning Computational Framework for Material Homogenizationcited by 7
  5. 2025Neural-Initialized Newton: Accelerating Nonlinear Finite Elements via Operator Learningcited by 6
  6. 2025Operator Learning at Machine Precisioncited by 6
  7. 2025A Neural-Operator Preconditioned Newton Method for Accelerated Nonlinear Solverscited by 4
  8. 2024Error analysis for finite element operator learning methods for solving parametric second-order elliptic PDEscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.