Spectrally Safe Neural Operator Warm-Starts for Large-Scale Newton Solvers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural operators are increasingly used to warm-start Newton solvers for nonlinear PDEs, on the premise that a low test error places the initial guess inside the basin of attraction. We show that this premise is unreliable. An operator trained to the relative (L2) error (O(10-3)) can still produce an initial state in which the discrete Jacobian is indefinite, because the mean-squared training controls error on average while leaving localized pointwise violations of the underlying physics. For a nearly incompressible hyperelasticity problem, we trace this to the predicted volume change: the operator disperses (det F) well away from one, and the resulting Jacobian acquires negative eigenvalues even when the predicted field is visually indistinguishable from the reference. At a small scale, this is a nuisance; at a multi-million degree-of-freedom scale, it is disqualifying, since the conjugate gradient and other Krylov solvers needed for memory-feasible Newton steps assume a definite spectrum. We then show that a short, label-free fine-tuning phase -- penalizing the operator against the discrete energy, with no additional solution data -- shifts the Jacobian spectrum back to positive definite. Combined with an inexact outer loop, this gives a warm-started Newton method that converges across the full loading range where the unregularized operator fails, reaching up to 5.4(×) wall-clock speedup over incremental continuation on a 3D problem with 6.4 million degrees of freedom.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2026.
Builds on
20 of 46 references.
References · 20
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
- 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 299
- 2023Spherical Fourier Neural Operators: Learning Stable Dynamics on the Spherecited by 225
- 2022Multifidelity deep neural operators for efficient learning of partial differential equations with application to fast inverse design of nanoscale heat transportcited by 92
- 2025Transolver++: An Accurate Neural Solver for PDEs on Million-Scale Geometriescited by 89
- 2022Blending Neural Operators and Relaxation Methods in PDE Numerical Solverscited by 53
- 2023On the training and generalization of deep operator networkscited by 31
- 2023Elliptic PDE learning is provably data-efficientcited by 26
8 more
- 2023Finite Element Operator Network for Solving Elliptic-type parametric PDEscited by 14
- 2023Spectral operator learning for parametric PDEs without data reliancecited by 9
- 2025NOWS: Neural Operator Warm Starts for Accelerating Iterative Solverscited by 9
- 2024A Pretraining-Finetuning Computational Framework for Material Homogenizationcited by 7
- 2025Neural-Initialized Newton: Accelerating Nonlinear Finite Elements via Operator Learningcited by 6
- 2025Operator Learning at Machine Precisioncited by 6
- 2025A Neural-Operator Preconditioned Newton Method for Accelerated Nonlinear Solverscited by 4
- 2024Error analysis for finite element operator learning methods for solving parametric second-order elliptic PDEscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Transferability of Learned States in Neural PDE Solverscited by 0
- 2026Transferability of Learned States in Neural PDE Solvers7 Oct 2026