mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ATLAS: Agentic Taxonomy of Large-Scale Software Ecosystems

arXiv 2606.21597 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2026cs.SE cs.CL cs.IRcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

The open-source ecosystem on GitHub lacks a systematic hierarchical taxonomy of software repositories. GitHub Topics, the dominant organizational mechanism, is flat, inconsistent, and covers only 67% of projects. We present ATLAS, the first framework that automatically constructs a hierarchical taxonomy for software repositories and classifies projects into it end-to-end. By combining LLM global knowledge with real repository distributions, ATLAS proposes meaningful splitting dimensions and iteratively corrects those that fail to accommodate real projects. A Designer Agent proposes splitting dimensions while a Classifier Agent assigns repositories; a self-corrective refinement loop uses classification failures to drive dimension revision through escalating strategies. We evaluate ATLAS on 54,387 GitHub repositories against six baselines spanning four paradigms, two downstream tasks, and three model families. On a stratified 2,001-repository benchmark, ATLAS achieves a Taxonomy Quality F-score (TQF) of 83.13%, outperforming the best baseline by 15 percentage points (on the full 54k corpus the approximate TQF is 73.0%, a gap driven by Path Granularity's all-or-nothing scoring on longer paths rather than lower classification accuracy). It is the only method to simultaneously achieve high structural quality and high practical applicability. On downstream tasks, ATLAS enables alternative discovery with P@1 = 85.71%, surpassing even human-curated lists (62.34%), and achieves the highest P@1 for repository retrieval. The taxonomy further reveals structural ecosystem trends that are difficult to obtain from flat tags or similarity methods: the shift from libraries to AI/ML applications (now 61% of newly community-adopted projects) becomes visible only through hierarchical, type-based categorization. An interactive taxonomy explorer is available at https://atlas-taxonomy.netlify.app/

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.

Builds on

15 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024MAGIS: LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for GitHub Issue Resolution26 Mar
  2. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development16 Jul

Other references · 13

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2018TaxoGen: Unsupervised Topic Taxonomy Construction by Adaptive Term Embedding and Clusteringcited by 48
  3. 2020TaxoExpan: Self-supervised Taxonomy Expansion with Position-Enhanced Graph Neural Networkcited by 37
  4. 2018What's in a GitHub Star? Understanding Repository Starring Practices in a Social Coding Platformcited by 25
  5. 2024Chain-of-Layer: Iteratively Prompting Large Language Models for Taxonomy Induction from Limited Examplescited by 24
  6. 2020Sampling in Software Engineering Research: A Critical Review and Guidelinescited by 23
  7. 2025TaxoAdapt: Aligning LLM-Based Multidimensional Taxonomy Construction to Evolving Research Corporacited by 23
  8. 2020Topic Recommendation for Software Repositories using Multi-label Classification Algorithmscited by 20
  9. 2019HiGitClass: Keyword-Driven Hierarchical Classification of GitHub Repositoriescited by 19
  10. 2024Automatic Bottom-Up Taxonomy Construction: A Software Application Domain Studycited by 5
  11. 2022GitRanking: A Ranking of GitHub Topics for Software Classification using Active Samplingcited by 3
  12. 2025LITE: LLM-Impelled efficient Taxonomy Evaluationcited by 2
1 more
  1. 2025How Far Have LLMs Come Toward Automated SATD Taxonomy Construction?cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Agentic Repository Mining: A Multi-Task Evaluation
  2. 2026AgentLogs: A Dataset for Opening the Black Box of GitHub's Cloud Agent
  3. 2026CodeGraph: Open-Taxonomy Knowledge Graph for Source Code with Wikidata Grounding
  4. 2026Repository Intelligence Graph: Deterministic Architectural Map for LLM Code Assistants
  5. 2026ReCUBE: Evaluating Repository-Level Context Utilization in Code Generation
  6. 2026Large-scale Repository Engineering via Agent-Native Reusable Code Primitives
  7. 2026Correct Code, Broken Contributions? SWE-CC: Benchmarking Repository Policy Compliance for Coding Agents
  8. 2025Code2MCP: Transforming Code Repositories into MCP Services