GEMS: Geometric Constraints Enable Multi-Semantic Superposition in LLMs
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Activation steering methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Activation steering controls model behavior by modifying intermediate hidden states at inference time without retraining. Existing methods handle only single-direction injection; when multiple semantic directions are superposed without constraints, the model collapses. We show that this collapse decomposes into two independently acting sources: distributional deviation, where additive perturbations accumulate in norm across layers and drive activations outside the training distribution, and directional interference, where non-orthogonal semantic vectors mutually dampen when superposed. These two sources define the design constraints that any training-free multi-directional intervention must address. As one instantiation of these principles, we propose GEMS, a training-free method that maps each source to a corresponding geometric constraint: norm-preserving weighted superposition and targeted attention-pathway injection for distributional deviation, and real-time orthogonalization for directional interference. On GSM8K, injecting three concurrent non-mathematical directions preserves accuracy at 98% (baseline 92%), while unconstrained addition collapses to 4%; on Wikitext-2, the same injection incurs only 2.2% PPL increase. Component ablation isolates the causal role of each constraint, and layer-level probes confirm that orthogonalized signals survive the FFN pathway and reach the output distribution with semantic specificity. Qualitative steering effects transfer across architectures from 3B to 31B.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Activation steering methods, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 15 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.
Builds on
15 of 17 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2026A Geometric Account of Activation Steering through Angle-Norm Decomposition4 Jun
- 2026Enhancing Instruction Following of LLMs via Activation Steering with Dynamic Rejection6 Mar
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition9 Dec
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering20 Aug
Other references · 11
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
- 2025Multi-Attribute Steering of Language Models via Targeted Interventioncited by 46
- 2025Beyond Linear Steering: Unified Multi-Attribute Control for Language Modelscited by 25
- 2026From Data Statistics to Feature Geometry: How Correlations Shape Superpositioncited by 10
- 2025The Geometries of Truth Are Orthogonal Across Taskscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Rogue Scalpel: Activation Steering Compromises LLM Safety
- 2024Everything Everywhere All at Once: LLMs can In-Context Learn Multiple Tasks in Superposition
- 2026Activation Steering Induces Emergent Misalignment: A More Comprehensive Evaluation
- 2026Local Linearity of LLMs Enables Activation Steering via Model-Based Linear Optimal Control
- 2024Semantics-Adaptive Activation Intervention for LLMs via Dynamic Steering Vectors
- 2026On the Non-Identifiability of Steering Vectors in Large Language Models
- 2026Where to Steer: Input-Dependent Layer Selection for Steering Improves LLM Alignment
- 2025Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms