mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neural Additive and Basis Models with Feature Selection and Interactions

arXiv 2606.19850 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) exhibit attractive performance in various fields but often suffer from low interpretability. The neural additive model (NAM) and its variant called the neural basis model (NBM) use neural networks (NNs) as nonlinear shape functions in generalized additive models (GAMs). Both models are highly interpretable and exhibit good performance and flexibility for NN training. NAM and NBM can provide and visualize the contribution of each feature to the prediction owing to GAM-based architectures. However, when using two-input NNs to consider feature interactions or when applying them to high-dimensional datasets, training NAM and NBM becomes intractable due to the increase in the computational resources required. This paper proposes incorporating the feature selection mechanism into NAM and NBM to resolve computational bottlenecks. We introduce the feature selection layer in both models and update the selection weights during training. Our method is simple and can reduce computational costs and model sizes compared to vanilla NAM and NBM. In addition, it enables us to use two-input NNs even in high-dimensional datasets and capture feature interactions. We demonstrate that the proposed models are computationally efficient compared to vanilla NAM and NBM, and they exhibit better or comparable performance with state-of-the-art GAMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.

Builds on

16 of 26 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  4. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  6. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  7. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
  8. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,148
  9. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  10. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 648
  11. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 319
  12. 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 246
4 more
  1. 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 203
  2. 2019Sparse Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 170
  3. 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
  4. 2022Neural Basis Models for Interpretabilitycited by 56

Built on by

Not cited yet.