mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AgentFinVQA: A Deployable Multi-Agent Pipeline for Auditable Financial Chart QA

arXiv 2606.19782 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Financial chart question answering in regulated settings demands more than accuracy: practitioners must know which answers to trust before acting on them, and many institutions cannot send client data to external model providers. Yet existing chart-QA agents are accuracy-focused and opaque, and most assume proprietary API access; to our knowledge, none combines auditability with on-premise deployability without significant accuracy compromise. We present AgentFinVQA, a multi-agent pipeline that decomposes each query into planning, OCR, legend grounding, visual inspection, and verification, recording every step in a traceable Model Evaluation Packet (MEP) per sample. On FinMME, AgentFinVQA improves +7.68 pp over a primary-backbone matched zero-shot baseline with a proprietary backbone (Gemini-3 Flash; 71.24% vs. 63.56%, McNemar p ≈ 1.1 × 10-16), and +4.84 pp with open-weights Qwen3.6-27B-FP8 served locally. The verifier's verdict also serves as a useful confidence signal (68.2% vs. 55.6% exact accuracy on confirmed vs. revised answers), enabling human-in-the-loop review routing. Error analysis shows that question misunderstanding, legend confusion and extraction error account for nearly two-thirds of failures and are the categories least detected by the verifier, identifying clear directions for future work. Together these results show that auditable, on-premise financial chart QA is practical and that the open-weights system keeps most of the accuracy gains while enabling full data residency. We release our code to support reproducible evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 23 references.

References · 17

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
  4. 2018DVQA: Understanding Data Visualizations via Question Answeringcited by 338
  5. 2019PlotQA: Reasoning over Scientific Plotscited by 317
  6. 2017FigureQA: An Annotated Figure Dataset for Visual Reasoningcited by 314
  7. 2023UniChart: A Universal Vision-language Pretrained Model for Chart Comprehension and Reasoningcited by 158
  8. 2023MAC-SQL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to-SQLcited by 158
  9. 2022DePlot: One-shot visual language reasoning by plot-to-table translationcited by 157
  10. 2022MatCha: Enhancing Visual Language Pretraining with Math Reasoning and Chart Derenderingcited by 132
  11. 2025ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answeringcited by 105
  12. 2025FinMME: Benchmark Dataset for Financial Multi-Modal Reasoning Evaluationcited by 27
5 more
  1. 2025ChartSketcher: Reasoning with Multimodal Feedback and Reflection for Chart Understandingcited by 13
  2. 2026Through the Lens of Contrast: Self-Improving Visual Reasoning in VLMscited by 10
  3. 2025FAITH: A Framework for Assessing Intrinsic Tabular Hallucinations in Financecited by 8
  4. 2025ChartAgent: A Multimodal Agent for Visually Grounded Reasoning in Complex Chart Question Answeringcited by 7
  5. 2025ChartAgent: A Chart Understanding Framework with Tool Integrated Reasoningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.