Measuring Curriculum Alignment across Topical Coverage, Competency, and Cognitive Depth: A Longitudinal Framework Applied to CS2013 and CS2023
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Undergraduate computer science is governed by international curricular guidelines revised about once a decade, yet programs lack a reliable way to measure how completely they cover the current guideline and how coverage shifts when it changes. Existing analyses rely on topic models or manual tagging, seldom report reliability, do not benchmark the matching method, and examine topical overlap at a single point in time. We address these gaps with a staged pipeline that separates candidate generation from confirmation, applied to one accredited Bachelor of Science in Computer Science against Computer Science Curricula 2013 (CS2013) and 2023 (CS2023). Semantic retrieval proposes candidate course-to-knowledge-unit matches, a large language model confirms each against an explicit coverage rule, and an independent expert validates the resulting map. Benchmarking seven retrievers against pooled relevance judgments, we find that no automatic configuration reaches acceptable precision and recall, peaking at an F1 of 0.55 and inflating apparent coverage once tuned for recall, establishing retrieval as a candidate generator, not a measurement. Each map was validated by two independent experts and reconciled to a consensus, with substantial first-pass agreement (Cohen's kappa 0.64 and 0.69); the reported coverage is the lenient end of a sensitivity band whose strict end lies about seven points lower. Coverage of CS2023 is 48.4 percent of knowledge units, 59.4 percent by recommended hours, and about 28 percent of topics, and sixty-nine percent of covered units rest on a single course. The program articulates most competencies it covers yet meets the recommended cognitive depth far less often under CS2023 than under CS2013, a gap that survives a sensitivity analysis of the mapping, while structural gaps stay separable from artifacts of the standard's evolution. The instrument is reusable and released.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.
Builds on
14 of 61 references.
References · 14
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,253
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,252
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
- 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 723
- 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 640
- 2023A Review of the Trends and Challenges in Adopting Natural Language Processing Methods for Education Feedback Analysiscited by 12
- 2025An Ontology for Representing Curriculum and Learning Materialcited by 2
- 2026An NLP-Driven Framework for Curriculum-Labor Market Alignment: Schema-Constrained LLM Extraction, ESCO-Anchored Semantic Matching, and Multi-Dimensional Gap Quantificationcited by 2
- 2022The use of Semantic Technologies in Computer Science Curriculum: A Systematic Reviewcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026From Execution to Education: A Bloom-Aligned Framework for Measuring Educational Control in LLMs
- 2026K12-KGraph: A Curriculum-Aligned Knowledge Graph for Benchmarking and Training Educational LLMs
- 2025From Course to Skill: Evaluating LLM Performance in Curricular Analytics
- 2026Curriculum Brain: Constructing Curriculum Knowledge Graphs as a Substrate for Cognitive Diagnosis
- 2026Relying on LLMs: Student Practices and Instructor Norms are Changing in Computer Science Education ↗
- 2024CS-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Large Language Models towards Computer Science Mastery
- 2026EduResearchBench: A Hierarchical Atomic Task Decomposition Benchmark for Full-Lifecycle Educational Research
- 2026CHSR-RRF: A curriculum-gated hybrid retrieval framework with reciprocal rank fusion and leakage-aware benchmarking for educational RAG