DynAMO:Dynamic Asset Management Orchestration via Topological Multi-Agent Scheduling
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
While LLM-powered agents offer end-to-end automation for industrial asset lifecycles, real-world Industry 4.0 deployment is hindered by latency, concurrency instability, and safety risks. We present DynAMO (Dynamic Asset Management Orchestration), a deployment-ready engine using a Plan-then-Execute architecture to generate verifiable workflow graphs. DynAMO supports both SequentialWorkflow (topological execution) and ParallelWorkflow (dependency-aware concurrency). By dynamically identifying independent tasks, DynAMO preserves structural correctness and safety while significantly improving efficiency through controlled reasoning overlap. Across six controlled experiments on the AssetOpsBench industrial benchmark, DynAMO demonstrates substantial performance and robustness gains. Parallel execution reduces end-to-end latency by a median of 1.6x over sequential orchestration, rising to 1.8x on highly parallelizable workflows. After instrumenting external tool calls with realistic latencies, a latency decomposition shows that LLM reasoning and orchestration still account for more than 90% of execution time, identifying model inference as the primary system bottleneck. Structured context pruning reduces inference latency by approximately 30%, and DynAMO maintains correct functional behaviour (task completion, agent sequencing, and output quality) while exhibiting graceful degradation under controlled fault injection. Reproducibility analysis further confirms stable execution under repeated runs, with parallel scheduling reducing latency variance. These findings establish DynAMO as a practical blueprint for scalable, safe, and latency-aware agent deployment in Industry 4.0 automation pipelines. Code is available at: https://github.com/kushwaha001/DynAMO
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.
Builds on
4 of 10 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025A Declarative Language for Building And Orchestrating LLM-Powered Agent Workflows22 Dec
- 2025Agent WARPP: Workflow Adherence via Runtime Parallel Personalization23 Jul
Other references · 2
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AssetOpsBench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Task Automation in Industrial Asset Operations and Maintenance
- 2026Evaluating Temporal Semantic Caching and Workflow Optimization in Agentic Plan-Execute Pipelines
- 2026PeakBench: Benchmarking Resource-Aware Tool Invocation in LLM Agents
- 2026GraphBit: A Graph-based Agentic Framework for Non-Linear Agent Orchestration
- 2025Murakkab: Resource-Efficient Agentic Workflow Orchestration in Cloud Platforms
- 2026Pythia: Exploiting Workflow Predictability for Efficient Agent-Native LLM Serving
- 2026Substrate-Portable Execution for Production LLM Workflows
- 2026Serving Agentic Workflows with a Physical-Plan Compiler and Adaptive Runtime